1613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19035943)
1. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.
Macleod M; Strachan B; Bahl R; Howarth L; Goyder K; Van de Venne M; Murphy DJ
BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19035943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study.
Murphy DJ; Macleod M; Bahl R; Goyder K; Howarth L; Strachan B
BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1695-702; discussion 1702-3. PubMed ID: 19035944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum.
Kudish B; Blackwell S; Mcneeley SG; Bujold E; Kruger M; Hendrix SL; Sokol R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):749-54. PubMed ID: 16949408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal delivery.
Youssef R; Ramalingam U; Macleod M; Murphy DJ
BJOG; 2005 Jul; 112(7):941-5. PubMed ID: 15957996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
Bahl R; Van de Venne M; Macleod M; Strachan B; Murphy DJ
BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
Caughey AB; Sandberg PL; Zlatnik MG; Thiet MP; Parer JT; Laros RK
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):908-12. PubMed ID: 16260505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery.
Fitzgerald MP; Weber AM; Howden N; Cundiff GW; Brown MB;
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 109(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 17197584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.
de Leeuw JW; de Wit C; Kuijken JP; Bruinse HW
BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 17999693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of mediolateral episiotomy during labour: analysis of risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears.
Aukee P; Sundström H; Kairaluoma MV
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(7):856-60. PubMed ID: 16817086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy.
Hudelist G; Gelle'n J; Singer C; Ruecklinger E; Czerwenka K; Kandolf O; Keckstein J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):875-81. PubMed ID: 15746685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States.
Fenner DE; Genberg B; Brahma P; Marek L; DeLancey JO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Dec; 189(6):1543-9; discussion 1549-50. PubMed ID: 14710059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.
Benavides L; Wu JM; Hundley AF; Ivester TS; Visco AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
Gardella C; Taylor M; Benedetti T; Hitti J; Critchlow C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Could a mediolateral episiotomy prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury?
Revicky V; Nirmal D; Mukhopadhyay S; Morris EP; Nieto JJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Jun; 150(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20359810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatula-assisted deliveries: a large cohort of 1065 cases.
Boucoiran I; Valerio L; Bafghi A; Delotte J; Bongain A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Jul; 151(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 20434825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decreased anal sphincter lacerations associated with restrictive episiotomy use.
Clemons JL; Towers GD; McClure GB; O'Boyle AL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1620-5. PubMed ID: 15902167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed.
Sheiner E; Levy A; Walfisch A; Hallak M; Mazor M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Apr; 271(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 15024575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.
Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Kanarek KS
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):789-94. PubMed ID: 1923198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter rupture.
Räisänen SH; Vehviläinen-Julkunen K; Gissler M; Heinonen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(12):1365-72. PubMed ID: 19852569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
