These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

996 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19036144)

  • 1. Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers.
    Vickers AJ; Cronin AM; Elkin EB; Gonen M
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Nov; 8():53. PubMed ID: 19036144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.
    Vickers AJ; Elkin EB
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(6):565-74. PubMed ID: 17099194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks.
    Blanche P; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5381-97. PubMed ID: 24027076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the weighted area under the net benefit curve for decision curve analysis.
    Talluri R; Shete S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jul; 16():94. PubMed ID: 27431531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo decision curve analysis using aggregate data.
    Hozo I; Tsalatsanis A; Djulbegovic B
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2017 Feb; 47(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 28042671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Clinical Impact of Risk Prediction Models With Decision Curves: Guidance for Correct Interpretation and Appropriate Use.
    Kerr KF; Brown MD; Zhu K; Janes H
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jul; 34(21):2534-40. PubMed ID: 27247223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Graphical assessment of incremental value of novel markers in prediction models: From statistical to decision analytical perspectives.
    Steyerberg EW; Vedder MM; Leening MJ; Postmus D; D'Agostino RB; Van Calster B; Pencina MJ
    Biom J; 2015 Jul; 57(4):556-70. PubMed ID: 25042996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the predictive accuracy and the clinical benefit of a nomogram aimed to predict survival in node-positive prostate cancer patients: External validation on a multi-institutional database.
    Bianchi L; Schiavina R; Borghesi M; Bianchi FM; Briganti A; Carini M; Terrone C; Mottrie A; Gacci M; Gontero P; Imbimbo C; Marchioro G; Milanese G; Mirone V; Montorsi F; Morgia G; Novara G; Porreca A; Volpe A; Brunocilla E
    Int J Urol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):574-581. PubMed ID: 29633372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A discussion of calibration techniques for evaluating binary and categorical predictive models.
    Fenlon C; O'Grady L; Doherty ML; Dunnion J
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Jan; 149():107-114. PubMed ID: 29290291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of treatment thresholds to diagnostic-test evaluation: an alternative to the comparison of areas under receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Moons KG; Stijnen T; Michel BC; Büller HR; Van Es GA; Grobbee DE; Habbema JD
    Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 9343803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive performance of the competing risk model in screening for preeclampsia.
    Wright D; Tan MY; O'Gorman N; Poon LC; Syngelaki A; Wright A; Nicolaides KH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):199.e1-199.e13. PubMed ID: 30447210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing Decision-Analysis Performances of Risk Prediction Models Using ADAPT Curves.
    Lee WC; Wu YC
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jan; 95(2):e2477. PubMed ID: 26765451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finding the optimal multiple-test strategy using a method analogous to logistic regression: the diagnosis of hepatolenticular degeneration (Wilson's disease).
    Richards RJ; Hammitt JK; Tsevat J
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 8912298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Net benefit approaches to the evaluation of prediction models, molecular markers, and diagnostic tests.
    Vickers AJ; Van Calster B; Steyerberg EW
    BMJ; 2016 Jan; 352():i6. PubMed ID: 26810254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical inference for decision curve analysis, with applications to cataract diagnosis.
    Sande SZ; Li J; D'Agostino R; Yin Wong T; Cheng CY
    Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(22):2980-3002. PubMed ID: 32667093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Putting risk prediction in perspective: relative utility curves.
    Baker SG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Nov; 101(22):1538-42. PubMed ID: 19843888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A decision support system to facilitate management of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Chu A; Ahn H; Halwan B; Kalmin B; Artifon EL; Barkun A; Lagoudakis MG; Kumar A
    Artif Intell Med; 2008 Mar; 42(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 18063351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating a new marker for risk prediction: decision analysis to the rescue.
    Baker SG; Kramer BS
    Discov Med; 2012 Sep; 14(76):181-8. PubMed ID: 23021372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calibration of risk prediction models: impact on decision-analytic performance.
    Van Calster B; Vickers AJ
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Feb; 35(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25155798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic decision support graph--visualization of ANN-generated diagnostic indications of pathological conditions developing over time.
    Ellenius J; Groth T
    Artif Intell Med; 2008 Mar; 42(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 18459185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 50.