These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19036359)

  • 41. Measuring ambiguity.
    Fisher GH
    Am J Psychol; 1967 Dec; 80(4):541-57. PubMed ID: 4866288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Are random events perceived as rare? On the relationship between perceived randomness and outcome probability.
    Teigen KH; Keren G
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):299-313. PubMed ID: 31900799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Context effects in probability learning and decision-making.
    Schipper LM
    Psychol Rep; 1966 Feb; 18(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 5908473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A re-examination of "bias" in human randomness perception.
    Warren PA; Gostoli U; Farmer GD; El-Deredy W; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):663-680. PubMed ID: 29058943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Incorporating postleap checks in tau-leaping.
    Anderson DF
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Feb; 128(5):054103. PubMed ID: 18266441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A random walk through middle land. How randomness rules our world and why we cannot see it, part 2.
    Shermer M
    Sci Am; 2008 Oct; 299(4):40. PubMed ID: 18847083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Patent guide for miniaturists.
    Dehlinger PJ
    Biomed Microdevices; 1999; 1(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 16281109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Commitment under conditions of risk.
    Watts WA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1966 May; 3(5):507-15. PubMed ID: 5939599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Folk numeracy and middle land. Why our brains do not intuitively grasp probabilities, Part 1.
    Shermer M
    Sci Am; 2008 Sep; 299(3):40. PubMed ID: 18783049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. On the consistency of preferences in Allais' paradox.
    Morrison DG
    Behav Sci; 1967 Sep; 12(5):373-83. PubMed ID: 6059769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Concept identification as a function of completeness and probability of information feed back.
    BOURNE LE; PENDLETON RB
    J Exp Psychol; 1958 Nov; 56(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 13598827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The dependence of probability response on size of step interval in the method of limits.
    BRACKMANN J; COLLIER G
    J Exp Psychol; 1958 May; 55(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 13539329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Interdependent data and human conservatism.
    Goldstein M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 1979 May; 32(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 444444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Probability estimates.
    Grimwade AM
    Science; 1986 Sep; 233(4768):1027. PubMed ID: 17746571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. To P or not to P: that is the question.
    Boyd JC; Annesley TM
    Clin Chem; 2014 Jul; 60(7):909-10. PubMed ID: 24829273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. MORTALITY RISK INFORMATION, SURVIVAL EXPECTATIONS AND SEXUAL BEHAVIOURS.
    Ciancio A; Delavande A; Kohler HP; Kohler IV
    Econ J (London); 2024 May; 134(660):1431-1464. PubMed ID: 38707864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical Assessment of Judgment in Adults and the Elderly: Development and Validation of the Three Domains of Judgment Test-Clinical Version (3DJT-CV).
    Bernard-Arevalo SP; Laforce RJ; Khayat O; Bouchard V; Bruneau MA; Brunelle S; Caron S; Chamelian L; Chénard M; Côté JF; Crépeau-Gendron G; Doré MC; Fortin MP; Gagnon N; Gagnon PR; Giroux C; Jean L; Létourneau G; Marceau É; Moreau V; Morin M; Ouellet C; Poulin S; Radermaker S; Rousseau K; Touchette C; Dumais A
    J Clin Med; 2023 May; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 37297934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. People express more bias in their predictions than in their likelihood judgments.
    Park I; Windschitl PD; Miller JE; Smith AR; Stuart JO; Biangmano M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 36048058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. On the use of discrete-time quantum walks in decision theory.
    Chen M; Ferro GM; Sornette D
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273551. PubMed ID: 36040872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Using a Foreign Language Changes Medical Judgments of Preventative Care.
    Hayakawa S; Pan Y; Marian V
    Brain Sci; 2021 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34679374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.