120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19036720)
1. Asymmetric mammographic findings based on the fourth edition of BI-RADS: types, evaluation, and management.
Youk JH; Kim EK; Ko KH; Kim MJ
Radiographics; 2009; 29(1):e33. PubMed ID: 19036720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Focal asymmetric densities seen at mammography: US and pathologic correlation.
Samardar P; de Paredes ES; Grimes MM; Wilson JD
Radiographics; 2002; 22(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 11796895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The spectrum of breast asymmetries: imaging features, work-up, management.
Sickles EA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):765-71, v. PubMed ID: 17888767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition.
Rao AA; Feneis J; Lalonde C; Ojeda-Fournier H
Radiographics; 2016; 36(3):623-39. PubMed ID: 27082663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of step-oblique mammography for confirmation and localization of densities seen on only one standard mammographic view.
Pearson KL; Sickles EA; Frankel SD; Leung JW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Mar; 174(3):745-52. PubMed ID: 10701619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Posterior breast cancer - mammographic and ultrasonographic features.
Janković A; Nadrljanski M; Karapandzić VP; Ivanović N; Radojicić Z; Milosević Z
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2013 Nov; 70(11):1034-8. PubMed ID: 24397199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BI-RADS
Spak DA; Plaxco JS; Santiago L; Dryden MJ; Dogan BE
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Mar; 98(3):179-190. PubMed ID: 28131457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Radiological features of breast cancer].
Kettritz U
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 2005; 89():48-51. PubMed ID: 18035672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings.
Leung JW; Sickles EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):667-75. PubMed ID: 17312052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardized diagnosis and reporting of breast cancer.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Tardivon A; Chopier J
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014; 95(7-8):759-66. PubMed ID: 25017150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.
Orel SG; Kay N; Reynolds C; Sullivan DC
Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 10352614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G
Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BI-RADS update.
Mercado CL
Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24792650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammographic findings after breast augmentation with autologous fat injection.
Carvajal J; Patiño JH
Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 19083521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
