These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19036720)

  • 1. Asymmetric mammographic findings based on the fourth edition of BI-RADS: types, evaluation, and management.
    Youk JH; Kim EK; Ko KH; Kim MJ
    Radiographics; 2009; 29(1):e33. PubMed ID: 19036720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Focal asymmetric densities seen at mammography: US and pathologic correlation.
    Samardar P; de Paredes ES; Grimes MM; Wilson JD
    Radiographics; 2002; 22(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 11796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The spectrum of breast asymmetries: imaging features, work-up, management.
    Sickles EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):765-71, v. PubMed ID: 17888767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition.
    Rao AA; Feneis J; Lalonde C; Ojeda-Fournier H
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(3):623-39. PubMed ID: 27082663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of step-oblique mammography for confirmation and localization of densities seen on only one standard mammographic view.
    Pearson KL; Sickles EA; Frankel SD; Leung JW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Mar; 174(3):745-52. PubMed ID: 10701619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Posterior breast cancer - mammographic and ultrasonographic features.
    Janković A; Nadrljanski M; Karapandzić VP; Ivanović N; Radojicić Z; Milosević Z
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2013 Nov; 70(11):1034-8. PubMed ID: 24397199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
    Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BI-RADS
    Spak DA; Plaxco JS; Santiago L; Dryden MJ; Dogan BE
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Mar; 98(3):179-190. PubMed ID: 28131457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Radiological features of breast cancer].
    Kettritz U
    Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 2005; 89():48-51. PubMed ID: 18035672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings.
    Leung JW; Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):667-75. PubMed ID: 17312052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
    Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardized diagnosis and reporting of breast cancer.
    Thomassin-Naggara I; Tardivon A; Chopier J
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014; 95(7-8):759-66. PubMed ID: 25017150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.
    Orel SG; Kay N; Reynolds C; Sullivan DC
    Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 10352614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
    Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. BI-RADS update.
    Mercado CL
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24792650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic findings after breast augmentation with autologous fat injection.
    Carvajal J; Patiño JH
    Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 19083521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.