These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19036720)

  • 21. Updates and revisions to the BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging lexicon.
    Edwards SD; Lipson JA; Ikeda DM; Lee JM
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2013 Aug; 21(3):483-93. PubMed ID: 23928239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening.
    Vinnicombe S
    Cancer Imaging; 2016 Jul; 16(1):17. PubMed ID: 27456031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.
    Berg WA; Campassi C; Langenberg P; Sexton MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1769-77. PubMed ID: 10845521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. US of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical management.
    Raza S; Goldkamp AL; Chikarmane SA; Birdwell RL
    Radiographics; 2010 Sep; 30(5):1199-213. PubMed ID: 20833845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Developing Asymmetries at Mammography: A Multimodality Approach to Assessment and Management.
    Chesebro AL; Winkler NS; Birdwell RL; Giess CS
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 26963449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice.
    Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E
    Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 14770425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. BI-RADS decoded: detailed guidance on potentially confusing issues.
    D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):751-63, v. PubMed ID: 17888766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) or French "classification ACR" What tool for what use? A point of view.
    Dilhuydy MH
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 17184950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Additional images and subsequent palpation--indispensable conditions for efficient diagnosis using mammography].
    Hüppe JR
    Z Lymphol; 1986 Dec; 10(2):63-76. PubMed ID: 3825243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. BI-RADS 3 for magnetic resonance imaging.
    Comstock C; Sung JS
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2013 Aug; 21(3):561-70. PubMed ID: 23928245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk.
    Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
    Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Presentation of the French translation of the Breast Imaging Reporting System and Data System (BI-RADS)].
    Lévy L; Suissa M; Bokobsa J; Tristant H; Chiche JF; Martin B; Teman G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 May; 33(5):338-47. PubMed ID: 15922646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Neddle-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer].
    Becerra-Alcántara GI; Círigo-Villagómez LL; Ramos-Medina F; Robledo-Martínez H; Mar-Merinos CG; Panzi-Altamirano RM
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Jul; 83(7):400-7. PubMed ID: 26422910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breast density: clinical implications and assessment methods.
    Winkler NS; Raza S; Mackesy M; Birdwell RL
    Radiographics; 2015; 35(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 25763719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
    Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
    Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: multimodality imaging and histopathologic assessment.
    Choi BB; Shu KS
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Feb; 53(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 22090465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions.
    Nicholson BT; LoRusso AP; Smolkin M; Bovbjerg VE; Petroni GR; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 16935726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Breast calcifications: which are malignant?
    Muttarak M; Kongmebhol P; Sukhamwang N
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):907-13; quiz 914. PubMed ID: 19787181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.