These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19037825)

  • 1. Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review.
    Skaane P
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jan; 50(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 19037825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study.
    Skaane P; Skjennald A
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 15155893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
    Karssemeijer N; Bluekens AM; Beijerinck D; Deurenberg JJ; Beekman M; Visser R; van Engen R; Bartels-Kortland A; Broeders MJ
    Radiology; 2009 Nov; 253(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 19703851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided detection of masses in full-field digital mammography using screen-film mammograms for training.
    Kallenberg M; Karssemeijer N
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6879-91. PubMed ID: 19001703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading.
    Skaane P; Skjennald A; Young K; Egge E; Jebsen I; Sager EM; Scheel B; Søvik E; Ertzaas AK; Hofvind S; Abdelnoor M
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Nov; 46(7):679-89. PubMed ID: 16372686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.
    Lewin JM; Hendrick RE; D'Orsi CJ; Isaacs PK; Moss LJ; Karellas A; Sisney GA; Kuni CC; Cutter GR
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):873-80. PubMed ID: 11230669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current challenges of full field digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H; Van Steen A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):148-53. PubMed ID: 16461520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.
    Skaane P; Hofvind S; Skjennald A
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):708-17. PubMed ID: 17709826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-- results from a retrospective review.
    Hoff SR; Abrahamsen AL; Samset JH; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 22700555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital mammography in a screening programme and its implications for pathology: a comparative study.
    Feeley L; Kiernan D; Mooney T; Flanagan F; Hargaden G; Kell M; Stokes M; Kennedy M
    J Clin Pathol; 2011 Mar; 64(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 21177749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Michell MJ; Iqbal A; Wasan RK; Evans DR; Peacock C; Lawinski CP; Douiri A; Wilson R; Whelehan P
    Clin Radiol; 2012 Oct; 67(10):976-81. PubMed ID: 22625656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
    Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
    Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.
    Gur D; Abrams GS; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Perrin RL; Rathfon GY; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML; Bandos AI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):586-91. PubMed ID: 19620460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
    Hambly NM; McNicholas MM; Phelan N; Hargaden GC; O'Doherty A; Flanagan FL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography: image contrast and lesion characterization.
    Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Sato A; Saito M; Saito H; Matsuhashi T; Takahashi S
    Radiat Med; 2003; 21(4):166-71. PubMed ID: 14514123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening outcome in women repeatedly recalled for the same mammographic abnormality before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography.
    van Bommel R; Voogd AC; Louwman MW; Strobbe LJ; Venderink D; Duijm LE
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):553-561. PubMed ID: 27180183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening program: The Sogn and Fjordane study.
    Juel IM; Skaane P; Hoff SR; Johannessen G; Hofvind S
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):962-8. PubMed ID: 20942729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.