130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19037874)
1. [Computation and experimental examination of an implant structure made by a fibre-reinforced building method for the bypass of continuity defects of the mandible].
Hufenbach W; Gottwald R; Markwardt J; Eckelt U; Modler N; Reitemeier B
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Dec; 53(6):306-13. PubMed ID: 19037874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of mechanical stress in reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects.
Knoll WD; Gaida A; Maurer P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 34(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 16644232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accurate reconstruction of discontinuous mandible using a reverse engineering/computer-aided design/rapid prototyping technique: a preliminary clinical study.
Zhou LB; Shang HT; He LS; Bo B; Liu GC; Liu YP; Zhao JL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 68(9):2115-21. PubMed ID: 20542365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adaquate fixation of plates for stability during mandibular reconstruction.
Kimura A; Nagasao T; Kaneko T; Tamaki T; Miyamoto J; Nakajima T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 34(4):193-200. PubMed ID: 16624567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bridging mandibular continuity defects with miniplates: an experimental study.
Huh JY; Choi BH; Zhu SJ; Jung JH; Lee SH; You TM; Lee HJ; Li J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Sep; 102(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 16920538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite-element design and optimization of a three-dimensional tetrahedral porous titanium scaffold for the reconstruction of mandibular defects.
Luo D; Rong Q; Chen Q
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():176-183. PubMed ID: 28655500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D-FEM and histomorphology of mandibular reconstruction with the titanium functionally dynamic bridging plate.
Schuller-Götzburg P; Pleschberger M; Rammerstorfer FG; Krenkel C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 38(12):1298-305. PubMed ID: 19828292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The fitting accuracy of pre-bend reconstruction plates and their impact on the temporomandibular joint.
Wurm MC; Hagen J; Nkenke E; Neukam FW; Schlittenbauer T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 30470467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of stresses in implantation for grafted and plate-and-screw mandible reconstruction.
Nagasao T; Miyamoto J; Tamaki T; Kawana H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):346-56. PubMed ID: 20097102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical testing of different osteosynthesis systems for segmental resection of the mandible.
Schupp W; Arzdorf M; Linke B; Gutwald R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 May; 65(5):924-30. PubMed ID: 17448842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Stress tests of reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects].
Knoll WD; Gaida A; Maurer P
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2004 Jul; 8(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 15293119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Numerical study of the influence of material parameters on the mechanical behaviour of a rehabilitated edentulous mandible.
Favot LM; Berry-Kromer V; Haboussi M; Thiebaud F; Ben Zineb T
J Dent; 2014 Mar; 42(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 24321295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scope and limitations of methods of mandibular reconstruction: a long-term follow-up.
Maurer P; Eckert AW; Kriwalsky MS; Schubert J
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 48(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19647911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process.
Wagner A; Krach W; Schicho K; Undt G; Ploder O; Ewers R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Dec; 94(6):678-86. PubMed ID: 12464890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reconstruction plates to bridge mandibular defects: a clinical and experimental investigation in biomechanical aspects.
Yi Z; Jian-Guo Z; Guang-Yan Y; Ling L; Fu-Yun Z; Guo-Cheng Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 28(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 10609746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconstruction of the mandible using preshaped 2.3-mm titanium plates, autogenous cortical bone plates, particulate cancellous bone, and platelet-rich plasma: a retrospective analysis of 20 patients.
Mooren RE; Merkx MA; Kessler PA; Jansen JA; Stoelinga PJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2459-67. PubMed ID: 20633974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular reconstruction using autologous iliac bone and titanium mesh reinforced by laser welding for implant placement.
Yamashita Y; Yamaguchi Y; Tsuji M; Shigematsu M; Goto M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1143-6. PubMed ID: 19216287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology.
Cohen A; Laviv A; Berman P; Nashef R; Abu-Tair J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):661-6. PubMed ID: 19716728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aneurysmal bone cyst of the mandible: report of 3 cases.
Roychoudhury A; Rustagi A; Bhatt K; Bhutia O; Seith A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1996-2004. PubMed ID: 19686939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Failure location prediction by finite element analysis for an additive manufactured mandible implant.
Huo J; Dérand P; Rännar LE; Hirsch JM; Gamstedt EK
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Sep; 37(9):862-9. PubMed ID: 26227805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
