337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19038293)
1. Field preservation and DNA extraction methods for intestinal microbial diversity analysis in earthworms.
Thakuria D; Schmidt O; Liliensiek AK; Egan D; Doohan FM
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Mar; 76(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 19038293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gut wall bacteria of earthworms: a natural selection process.
Thakuria D; Schmidt O; Finan D; Egan D; Doohan FM
ISME J; 2010 Mar; 4(3):357-66. PubMed ID: 19924156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular profiling of 16S rRNA genes reveals diet-related differences of microbial communities in soil, gut, and casts of Lumbricus terrestris L. (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae).
Egert M; Marhan S; Wagner B; Scheu S; Friedrich MW
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2004 May; 48(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 19712402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel extraction strategy of ribosomal RNA and genomic DNA from cheese for PCR-based investigations.
Bonaïti C; Parayre S; Irlinger F
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 107(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 16269194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Field and microcosm experiments to evaluate the effects of agricultural Cu treatment on the density and genetic structure of microbial communities in two different soils.
Ranjard L; Echairi A; Nowak V; Lejon DP; Nouaïm R; Chaussod R
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2006 Nov; 58(2):303-15. PubMed ID: 17064271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differential effect of sample preservation methods on plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal DNA.
Bainard LD; Klironomos JN; Hart MM
J Microbiol Methods; 2010 Aug; 82(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20470836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbial diversity and community structure in Fynbos soil.
Slabbert E; Kongor RY; Esler KJ; Jacobs K
Mol Ecol; 2010 Mar; 19(5):1031-41. PubMed ID: 20089124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analyses of microbial consortia in the starter of Fen Liquor.
Shi JH; Xiao YP; Li XR; Ma EB; Du XW; Quan ZX
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):478-85. PubMed ID: 19187491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic assessment of automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) as a tool for estimating bacterial richness.
Kovacs A; Yacoby K; Gophna U
Res Microbiol; 2010 Apr; 161(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 20138144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for analysis of turkey cecal microbiota.
Scupham AJ; Jones JA; Wesley IV
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):401-9. PubMed ID: 17241345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of maple sap composition with bacterial and fungal communities determined by multiplex automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (MARISA).
Filteau M; Lagacé L; LaPointe G; Roy D
Food Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 28(5):980-9. PubMed ID: 21569942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA extraction procedure: a critical issue for bacterial diversity assessment in marine sediments.
Luna GM; Dell'Anno A; Danovaro R
Environ Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 8(2):308-20. PubMed ID: 16423017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploration of methods used to describe bacterial communities in silage of maize (Zea mays) cultivars.
Brusetti L; Borin S; Rizzi A; Mora D; Sorlini C; Daffonchio D
Environ Biosafety Res; 2008; 7(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 18384727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis for analysing the gut microflora of Lumbricus rubellus Hoffmeister under different feeding conditions.
Knapp BA; Seeber J; Podmirseg SM; Meyer E; Insam H
Bull Entomol Res; 2008 Jun; 98(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 18439343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection and monitoring of anaerobic rumen fungi using an ARISA method.
Denman SE; Nicholson MJ; Brookman JL; Theodorou MK; McSweeney CS
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 47(6):492-9. PubMed ID: 19120916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diversity of anaerobic gut fungal populations analysed using ribosomal ITS1 sequences in faeces of wild and domesticated herbivores.
Nicholson MJ; McSweeney CS; Mackie RI; Brookman JL; Theodorou MK
Anaerobe; 2010 Apr; 16(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 19465140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Reaction of microorganisms to the digestive fluid of the earthworms].
Khomiakov NV; Kharin SA; Nechitaĭlo TIu; Golyshin PN; Kurakov AV; Byzov BA; Zviagintsev DG
Mikrobiologiia; 2007; 76(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 17410875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extraction of DNA from soil for analysis of bacterial diversity in transgenic and nontransgenic papaya sites.
Sheu C; Wu CY; Chen SC; Lo CC
J Agric Food Chem; 2008 Dec; 56(24):11969-75. PubMed ID: 19053384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bacterial community analysis of activated sludge: an evaluation of four commonly used DNA extraction methods.
Vanysacker L; Declerck SA; Hellemans B; De Meester L; Vankelecom I; Declerck P
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Sep; 88(1):299-307. PubMed ID: 20652692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in bacterial numbers and microbial activity of pig slurry during gut transit of epigeic and anecic earthworms.
Aira M; Monroy F; Domínguez J
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Mar; 162(2-3):1404-7. PubMed ID: 18639984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
