These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19039031)

  • 1. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Chu H; Guo H
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jan; 10(1):201-3. PubMed ID: 19039031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Summary ROC curve based on a weighted Youden index for selecting an optimal cutpoint in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.
    Rücker G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3069-78. PubMed ID: 21170902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonparametric meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Zapf A; Hoyer A; Kramer K; Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3831-41. PubMed ID: 26174020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Annals of Emergency Medicine Journal Club. The conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of studies of diagnostic tests, and a consideration of ROC curves: answers to the January 2010 Journal Club questions.
    Reynolds TA; Schriger DL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Jun; 55(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 20494226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 1): Analysis of the properties of a diagnostic test].
    Cerda L J; Cifuentes A L
    Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Jun; 27(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 20737121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tailored meta-analysis: an investigation of the correlation between the test positive rate and prevalence.
    Willis BH; Coomar D; Baragilly M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():1-9. PubMed ID: 30278213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A mixed model approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies with binary test outcome.
    Doebler P; Holling H; Böhning D
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):418-36. PubMed ID: 22582866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining the area under the ROC curve for a binary diagnostic test.
    Cantor SB; Kattan MW
    Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):468-70. PubMed ID: 11059479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Harbord RM; Deeks JJ; Egger M; Whiting P; Sterne JA
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 16698768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Jones R
    Fam Pract; 2004 Feb; 21(1):3. PubMed ID: 14760035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves with flexible parametric distributions of diagnostic test values.
    Hoyer A; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):301-313. PubMed ID: 31953903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care.
    Mallett S; Halligan S; Thompson M; Collins GS; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e3999. PubMed ID: 22750423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Systematic reviews of studies of diagnostic test accuracy].
    Moreno G G; Pantoja C T
    Rev Med Chil; 2009 Feb; 137(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 19543656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening test accuracy evaluations: methodologic primer.
    Gatsonis C; Paliwal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):271-81. PubMed ID: 16861527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies.
    Boissel J; Cucherat M
    Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(3):484-7. PubMed ID: 9510593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosis in General Practice. Using probabilistic reasoning.
    Doust J
    BMJ; 2009 Nov; 339():b3823. PubMed ID: 19887528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power and sample size calculation of comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple correlated test results.
    Liu A; Schisterman EF; Mazumdar M; Hu J
    Biom J; 2005 Apr; 47(2):140-50. PubMed ID: 16389911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers.
    Kumar R; Indrayan A
    Indian Pediatr; 2011 Apr; 48(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 21532099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistics in the pathology laboratory: characteristics of diagnostic tests.
    Empson MB
    Pathology; 2001 Feb; 33(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 11280616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.