608 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19040441)
1. Marginal accuracy of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses after in vitro stress simulation.
Boeckler AF; Morton D; Kraemer S; Geiss-Gerstdorfer J; Setz JM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1261-9. PubMed ID: 19040441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal adaptation of three-unit fixed partial dentures constructed from pressed ceramic systems.
Stappert CF; Dai M; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
Br Dent J; 2004 Jun; 196(12):766-70; discussion 760, quiz 780. PubMed ID: 15220983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation.
Mehl C; Harder S; Wolfart M; Kern M; Wolfart S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19040447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention and leakage of implant-supported restorations luted with provisional cement: a pilot study.
Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 34(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 17302949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
Ayad MF
J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) Dental Implant System: an in vitro study.
Tosches NA; Brägger U; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 19126111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: effect of variations in preparation design.
Cho L; Song H; Koak J; Heo S
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 12447215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
Walton TR
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal adaptation of all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments.
Att W; Hoischen T; Gerds T; Strub JR
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 18241217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays.
Farrell CV; Johnson GH; Oswald MT; Tucker RD
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
