98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19040534)
1. Pilot study evaluating ureteric physiological changes with a novel 'ribbon stent' design using electromyographic and giant magnetoresistive sensors.
Natalin RA; Hruby GW; Okhunov Z; Singh H; Phillips CK; Humphrey PA; Gupta M; Landman J
BJU Int; 2009 Apr; 103(8):1128-31. PubMed ID: 19040534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The 'buoy' stent: evaluation of a prototype indwelling ureteric stent in a porcine model.
Krebs A; Deane LA; Borin JF; Edwards RA; Sala LG; Khan F; Abdelshehid C; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
BJU Int; 2009 Jul; 104(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 19154469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A study of ureteric peristalsis using a single catheter to record EMG, impedance, and pressure changes.
Roshani H; Dabhoiwala NF; Tee S; Dijkhuis T; Kurth KH; Ongerboer de Visser BW; de Jong JM; Lamers WH
Tech Urol; 1999 Mar; 5(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 10374803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ureteric response to abdominal radiotherapy and metallic double-pigtail ureteric stents: a pig model.
Liatsikos E; Kyriazis I; Kallidonis P; Tsamandas A; Karnabatidis D; Sakellaropoulos G; Flaris N; Kalogeropoulou C; Filos K; Stolzenburg JU; Kardamakis D
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(6):862-6. PubMed ID: 19389017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pharmacologic manipulation of the porcine ureter: Acute impact of topical drugs on ureteral diameter and peristaltic activity.
Ames CD; Weld KJ; Dryer ST; Hruby G; Minor SD; Yan Y; Figenshau RS; Bhayani S; Landman J; Venkatesh R
J Endourol; 2006 Nov; 20(11):943-8. PubMed ID: 17144869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz Pouch II): a nonrefluxing stented vs unstented laparoscopic porcine model.
Humphreys MR; Miller NL; Lingeman JE
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 17986286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of a double-pigtail stent on ureteral peristalsis in the porcine model: initial studies using a novel implantable magnetic sensor.
Venkatesh R; Landman J; Minor SD; Lee DI; Rehman J; Vanlangendonck R; Ragab M; Morrissey K; Sundaram CP; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 2005 Mar; 19(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 15798413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vivo evaluation of a novel spiral cut flexible ureteral stent.
Mucksavage P; Pick D; Haydel D; Etafy M; Kerbl DC; Lee JY; Ortiz-Vanderdys C; Saleh F; Olamendi S; Louie MK; McDougall EM
Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):733-7. PubMed ID: 22386429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel dual-lumen ureteral stents provide better ureteral flow than single ureteral stent in ex vivo porcine kidney model of extrinsic ureteral obstruction.
Hafron J; Ost MC; Tan BJ; Fogarty JD; Hoenig DM; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2006 Oct; 68(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 17070391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Renal pelvic function following total alloplastic replacement of ureter in pigs. Electrophysiology, renal function and morphology.
Djurhuus JC; Ladefoged O; Jorgensen SJ
Acta Chir Scand Suppl; 1976; 472():67-71. PubMed ID: 1072555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact on ureteral peristalsis in a stented ureter. An experimental study in the pig.
Kinn AC; Lykkeskov-Andersen H
Urol Res; 2002 Sep; 30(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 12202937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vivo endoluminal ultrasonographic study of peristaltic activity in the distal porcine ureter.
Roshani H; Dabhoiwala NF; Dijkhuis T; Kurth KH; Lamers WH
J Urol; 2000 Feb; 163(2):602-6. PubMed ID: 10647694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of ureteric stent kinking forces: the role of curvature in stent failure.
Christman MS; L'Esperance JO; Choe CH; Stroup SP; Auge BK
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(6):866-9; discussion 868-9. PubMed ID: 19712113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Infective complications associated with ureteral stents in renal transplant recipients.
Ranganathan M; Akbar M; Ilham MA; Chavez R; Kumar N; Asderakis A
Transplant Proc; 2009; 41(1):162-4. PubMed ID: 19249503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ureteric drainage and peristalsis after stenting studied using colour Doppler ultrasound.
Patel U; Kellett MJ
Br J Urol; 1996 Apr; 77(4):530-5. PubMed ID: 8777612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of a novel pancreatic stent design on short-term pancreatic injury in a canine model.
Raju GS; Gomez G; Xiao SY; Ahmed I; Brining D; Bhutani MS; Kalloo AN; Pasricha PJ
Endoscopy; 2006 Mar; 38(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 16528653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of a novel degradable ureteral stent in a porcine model.
Hadaschik BA; Paterson RF; Fazli L; Clinkscales KW; Shalaby SW; Chew BH
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):1161-6. PubMed ID: 18639278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Numerical analysis of the urine flow in a stented ureter with no peristalsis.
Kim HH; Choi YH; Lee SB; Baba Y; Kim KW; Suh SH
Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S215-23. PubMed ID: 26405994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term effects of ureteric stent after ureteric dilation.
Selmy GI; Hassouna MM; Bégin LR; Khalaf IM; Elhilali MM
J Urol; 1993 Dec; 150(6):1984-9. PubMed ID: 8230550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ureteric stenting 25 years on: routine or risky?
Lawrentschuk N; Russell JM
ANZ J Surg; 2004 Apr; 74(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 15043736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
