BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19040666)

  • 1. Computer-aided dental identification: an objective method for assessment of radiographic image similarity.
    Flint DJ; Brent Dove S; Brumit PC; White M; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 19040666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A quantitative analysis of subtraction images based on bite-wing radiographs for simulated victim identification in forensic dentistry.
    Wenzel A; Andersen L
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1994 Jun; 12(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9227082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital dental radiographic identification in the pediatric, mixed and permanent dentitions.
    Wood RE; Kirk NJ; Sweet DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):910-6. PubMed ID: 10486940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains.
    Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 11908607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An iterative point correspondence algorithm for automatic image registration: an application to dental subtraction radiography.
    Markaki VE; Asvestas PA; Matsopoulos GK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jan; 93(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18760858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Research methods in dentistry. 8. Methods for longitudinally detecting differences in bone density: digital subtraction radiography].
    van der Stelt PF
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Feb; 112(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 15747997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed dental radiography used to reproduce antemortem film position.
    Hubar JS; Carr RF
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Mar; 44(2):401-4. PubMed ID: 10097371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GrinLine identification using digital imaging and Adobe Photoshop.
    Bollinger SA; Brumit PC; Schrader BA; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Mar; 54(2):422-7. PubMed ID: 19187451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective image similarity measure for bronchoscope tracking based on image registration.
    Deguchi D; Mori K; Feuerstein M; Kitasaka T; Maurer CR; Suenaga Y; Takabatake H; Mori M; Natori H
    Med Image Anal; 2009 Aug; 13(4):621-33. PubMed ID: 19592291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital video image capture in establishing positive identification.
    Marks MK; Bennett JL; Wilson OL
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 May; 42(3):492-5. PubMed ID: 9144937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: advantages and limitations.
    Thali MJ; Markwalder T; Jackowski C; Sonnenschein M; Dirnhofer R
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 16423234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic recognition of dental implants as an aid to identifying the deceased.
    Berketa JW; Hirsch RS; Higgins D; James H
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 20002257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiography in forensic dental identification--a review.
    McKenna CJ
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1999 Dec; 17(2):47-53. PubMed ID: 10709564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of manipulation accuracy of digitized occlusal radiographic images--sub and over exposure.
    Maschtakow PS; Moraes ME; Soares MG; Santos LR; Moraes LC; Castilho JC
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2009; 22(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 19839487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic noise robust registration of radiographs for subtraction using strategic local correlation: an application to radiographs of dental implants.
    Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Lee SB; Huh KH
    Comput Biol Med; 2005 Mar; 35(3):247-58. PubMed ID: 15582631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast algorithm for detection of reference spheres in digital panoramic radiography.
    Brüllmann D; Mennickheim J; d'Hoedt B
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Jul; 39(7):615-9. PubMed ID: 19476931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Root morphology and anatomical patterns in forensic dental identification: a comparison of computer-aided identification with traditional forensic dental identification.
    van der Meer DT; Brumit PC; Schrader BA; Dove SB; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Nov; 55(6):1499-503. PubMed ID: 20629904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital analysis of bite marks and human identification.
    Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Apr; 45(2):327-42, ix. PubMed ID: 11370458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Virtual radiographs computed from TACT volume data as a gold standard for image registration prior to subtraction.
    Lehmann TM; Hemler PF; Webber RL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 12058267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new method for the automated alignment of dental radiographs for digital subtraction radiography.
    Yoon DC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 10654031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.