These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19040666)

  • 21. Positive dental identification using tooth anatomy and digital superimposition.
    Johansen RJ; Michael Bowers C
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):534-6. PubMed ID: 23278438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An automatic variational level set segmentation framework for computer aided dental X-rays analysis in clinical environments.
    Li S; Fevens T; Krzyzak A; Li S
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Mar; 30(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 16500077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new algorithm for use in computer identification.
    Williams AB; Friedman RB; Lorton L
    J Forensic Sci; 1989 May; 34(3):682-6. PubMed ID: 2738566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The applicability of holography in forensic identification: a fusion of the traditional optical technique and digital technique.
    Biwasaka H; Saigusa K; Aoki Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Mar; 50(2):393-9. PubMed ID: 15813551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Collection of intraoral findings in corpse with small-scale color dental scanner system.
    Yoshida M; Hanaoka Y; Tsuzuki T; Ueno A; Takagi T; Iwahara K; Yasuda M; Sato Y; Minaguchi K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Mar; 185(1-3):e25-8. PubMed ID: 19200671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative dental radiographic identification using flat panel CT.
    Birngruber CG; Obert M; Ramsthaler F; Kreutz K; Verhoff MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 209(1-3):e31-4. PubMed ID: 21592696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of seven methods of within-subjects rigid-body pedobarographic image registration.
    Pataky TC; Goulermas JY; Crompton RH
    J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):3085-9. PubMed ID: 18790481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A new method for the automated age-at-death evaluation by tooth-cementum annulation (TCA).
    Czermak A; Czermak A; Ernst H; Grupe G
    Anthropol Anz; 2006 Mar; 64(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 16623086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital subtraction radiography.
    Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 37(4):553-65. PubMed ID: 8224332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of two dental identification computer systems: DAVID and WinID3.
    Al-Amad SH; Clement JG; McCullough MJ; Morales A; Hill AJ
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2007 Jun; 25(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 17577975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images.
    Yu SH; Nahm DS; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e1-6; discussion e1. PubMed ID: 18538235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The application of CamScan 2 in forensic dentistry.
    Dostalova T; Eliasova H; Seydlova M; Broucek J; Vavrickova L
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2012 Oct; 19(7):373-80. PubMed ID: 22920758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A specimen positioning device for dental radiographic identification--image geometry considerations.
    Goldstein M; Sweet DJ; Wood RE
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 9456540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acquisition-related motion compensation for digital subtraction angiography.
    Ionasec RI; Heigl B; Hornegger J
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jun; 33(4):256-66. PubMed ID: 19231134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Observer-independent registration of perspective projection prior to subtraction of in vivo radiographs.
    Lehmann TM; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Schmitt W; Spitzer K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):140-50. PubMed ID: 9693526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new mathematical modelling based shape extraction technique for Forensic Odontology.
    G J; A B; Gurunathan U; B V; J PJ
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():39-45. PubMed ID: 28278437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Individual identification by means of conventional bitewing film and subtraction radiography.
    Andersen L; Wenzel A
    Forensic Sci Int; 1995 Mar; 72(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 7705736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Biomedical images segmentation by the regions growth method].
    Alvarez M; Rivas M; Rukoz M
    Acta Cient Venez; 2001; 52(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 11899712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. WinID2 versus CAPMI4: two computer-assisted dental identification systems.
    Lewis C
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 May; 47(3):536-8. PubMed ID: 12051332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of measurements from photographed lateral cephalograms and scanned cephalograms.
    Collins J; Shah A; McCarthy C; Sandler J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):830-3. PubMed ID: 18068604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.