These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19041084)

  • 1. Lengthening fixed preparatory foreperiod durations within a digit magnitude classification task serves mainly to shift distributions of response times upwards.
    Leth-Steensen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 19041084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of a cross-trial shift of auditory warning signals on the sequential foreperiod effect.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 20096395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
    Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.
    Los SA; Horoufchin H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 21213194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 19576562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reaction time changes with the hazard rate for a behaviorally relevant event when monkeys perform a delayed wrist movement task.
    Tsunoda Y; Kakei S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 18243554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Oct; 129(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 18804193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention control and the antisaccade task: a response time distribution analysis.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA; McMillan B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 21470585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An additive factor analysis of the effect of sub-anaesthetic doses of nitrous oxide on information processing: evidence for an impairment of the motor adjustment stage.
    Courtière A; Hardouin J; Vidal F; Possamaï CA; Hasbroucq T
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 Feb; 165(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 12451439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An additive factor analysis of the effect of depression on the reaction time of old patients.
    Bonin-Guillaume S; Blin O; Hasbroucq T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Sep; 117(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15288226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effective time course of preparation.
    Los SA; Schut ML
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Aug; 57(1):20-55. PubMed ID: 18255052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental dissociations of preparation over time: deconstructing the variable foreperiod phenomena.
    Vallesi A; Shallice T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1377-88. PubMed ID: 18085950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of advance information on the response complexity effect in manual aiming movements.
    Khan MA; Mourton S; Buckolz E; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 17521597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preparing the heart, eye, and brain: foreperiod length effects in a nonaging paradigm.
    Jennings JR; van der Molen MW; Steinhauer SR
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jan; 35(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 9499710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planning keypress and reaching responses: effects of response location and number of potential effectors.
    Adam JJ; Taminiau B; van Veen N; Ament B; Rijcken JM; Meijer K; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1464-78. PubMed ID: 19045986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What information is critical to elicit interference in number-form synaesthesia?
    Hubbard EM; Ranzini M; Piazza M; Dehaene S
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1200-16. PubMed ID: 19698941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A New Foreperiod Effect on Intertrial Phase Coherence. Part I: Existence and Behavioral Relevance.
    Rapela J; Westerfield M; Townsend J
    Neural Comput; 2018 Sep; 30(9):2348-2383. PubMed ID: 29949462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The scope and precision of specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):953-64. PubMed ID: 21264746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: reactions toward the source of stimulation.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):816-34. PubMed ID: 19485694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.