These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19041085)

  • 1. Reducing and restoring stimulus-response compatibility effects by decreasing the discriminability of location words.
    Miles JD; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 19041085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):830-44. PubMed ID: 8409861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual target discriminability modulates the Simon effect beyond the fading of distractor-based activation: Insights from delta plots and diffusion model analyses.
    Ellinghaus R; Liepelt R; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Aug; 50(8):842-858. PubMed ID: 38900524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return.
    Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):935-44. PubMed ID: 19679871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-intentional but not automatic: reduction of word- and arrow-based compatibility effects by sound distractors in the same categorical domain.
    Miles JD; Proctor RW
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Oct; 199(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 19688202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Co-occurrence of sequential and practice effects in the Simon task: Evidence for two independent mechanisms affecting response selection.
    Iani C; Rubichi S; Gherri E; Nicoletti R
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):358-67. PubMed ID: 19246350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age differences in response selection for pure and mixed stimulus-response mappings and tasks.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 18541219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of irrelevant response dimension on stimulus response compatibility.
    Shi K; Wang L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Mar; 223():103495. PubMed ID: 34999352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shared spatial representations for physical locations and location words in bilinguals' primary language.
    Vu KP; Ngo TK; Minakata K; Proctor RW
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Sep; 38(6):713-22. PubMed ID: 20852235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The eyes fixate the optimal viewing position of task-irrelevant words.
    Smilek D; Solman GJ; Murawski P; Carriere JS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 19145010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.
    Roelofs A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1325-36. PubMed ID: 16615380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical bottom-up attentional factors in the handle orientation effect: asymmetric luminance transients and object-center eccentricity relative to fixation.
    Kostov K; Janyan A
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1685-1705. PubMed ID: 32248290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential dynamics of spatial and non-spatial stimulus-response compatibility effects: a dual task LRP study.
    Lehle C; Cohen A; Sangals J; Sommer W; Stürmer B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 21030005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: effects of S-R association strength and relative timing.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):95-136. PubMed ID: 11216323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interference between nonspatial stimulus features in the Simon effect.
    Tagliabue M; Umiltà C; Spera P
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(4):431-53. PubMed ID: 20066924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. That's what task sets are for: shielding against irrelevant information.
    Dreisbach G; Haider H
    Psychol Res; 2008 Jul; 72(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 18057961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of visual stimulus mode on transfer of acquired spatial associations.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Zhang Y; Vu KP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):434-45. PubMed ID: 19271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.