These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19041512)

  • 1. Demagnetization of cochlear implants and temperature changes in 3.0T MRI environment.
    Majdani O; Leinung M; Rau T; Akbarian A; Zimmerling M; Lenarz M; Lenarz T; Labadie R
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 139(6):833-9. PubMed ID: 19041512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
    Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
    Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety study of the Cochlear Nucleus 24 device with internal magnet in the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner.
    Gubbels SP; McMenomey SO
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Jun; 116(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 16735911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reversing the polarity of a cochlear implant magnet after magnetic resonance imaging.
    Jeon JH; Bae MR; Chang JW; Choi JY
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2012 Aug; 39(4):415-7. PubMed ID: 21889279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MRI induced torque and demagnetization in retention magnets for a bone conduction implant.
    Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Reinfeldt S; Taghavi H; Eeg-Olofsson M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Jun; 61(6):1887-93. PubMed ID: 24845299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
    Weber BP; Goldring JE; Santogrossi T; Koestler H; Tziviskos G; Battmer R; Lenarz Th
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 9752965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of a Novel 3T MRI Compatible Cochlear Implant Magnet: Torque, Forces, Demagnetization, and Imaging.
    Tysome JR; Tam YC; Patterson I; Graves MJ; Gazibegovic D
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Dec; 40(10):e966-e974. PubMed ID: 31524762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts.
    Yang CW; Liu L; Wang J; Dong AS; Lu JP; He SS; Li M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 19493413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The Safety of MR Conditional Cochlear Implant at 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging System].
    Takahashi D; Ogura A; Hayashi N; Seino S; Kawai R; Matsuda T; Doi T; Tsuchihashi T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Aug; 72(8):674-80. PubMed ID: 27546081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on a new electromagnetic implantable middle ear hearing device.
    Hunyadi S; Werning JW; Lewin JS; Maniglia AJ
    Am J Otol; 1997 May; 18(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 9149826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraindividual Comparison of Image Artifacts of Two Generations of Rotatable Cochlear Implant Magnets.
    Kim R; Schleyer S; Björn Gehl H; Sudhoff H; Goon P; Todt I
    J Int Adv Otol; 2024 Jul; 20(4):306-311. PubMed ID: 39161162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of MRI compatibility of the modified nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem and cochlear implants.
    Heller JW; Brackmann DE; Tucci DL; Nyenhuis JA; Chou CK
    Am J Otol; 1996 Sep; 17(5):724-9. PubMed ID: 8892568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implant magnet displacement with minor head trauma.
    Yun JM; Colburn MW; Antonelli PJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Aug; 133(2):275-7. PubMed ID: 16087027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear implant with a non-removable magnet: preliminary research at 3-T MRI.
    Dubrulle F; Sufana Iancu A; Vincent C; Tourrel G; Ernst O
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1510-8. PubMed ID: 23300043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnet resonance imaging safety of the Vibrant Soundbridge system: a review.
    Wagner JH; Ernst A; Todt I
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1040-6. PubMed ID: 21844783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRI compatibility and safety of cochlear implants.
    Tang Q; Li Y
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Mar; 37(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 22561502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear implant magnet displacement during magnetic resonance imaging.
    Deneuve S; Loundon N; Leboulanger N; Rouillon I; Garabedian EN
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Sep; 29(6):789-190. PubMed ID: 18667941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pain Free 3 T MRI Scans in Cochlear Implantees.
    Todt I; Tittel A; Ernst A; Mittmann P; Mutze S
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e401-e404. PubMed ID: 28938274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MRI compatibility issues in otology.
    Fritsch MH; Mosier KM
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Oct; 15(5):335-40. PubMed ID: 17823550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.