These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19041528)
1. An observational, prospective study comparing tibial and humeral intraosseous access using the EZ-IO. Ong MEH; Chan YH; Oh JJ; Ngo AS Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Jan; 27(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19041528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EZ-IO in the ED: an observational, prospective study comparing flow rates with proximal and distal tibia intraosseous access in adults. Tan BK; Chong S; Koh ZX; Ong ME Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Oct; 30(8):1602-6. PubMed ID: 22244227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Military Medic Performance with Employment of a Commercial Intraosseous Infusion Device: A Randomized, Crossover Study. Gendron B; Cronin A; Monti J; Brigg A Mil Med; 2018 May; 183(5-6):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 29420766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Fluid Resuscitation Rate with and without External Pressure Using Two Intraosseous Infusion Systems for Adult Emergencies, the CITRIN (Comparison of InTRaosseous infusion systems in emergency medicINe)-Study. Hammer N; Möbius R; Gries A; Hossfeld B; Bechmann I; Bernhard M PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143726. PubMed ID: 26630579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraosseous infusion rates under high pressure: a cadaveric comparison of anatomic sites. Pasley J; Miller CH; DuBose JJ; Shackelford SA; Fang R; Boswell K; Halcome C; Casey J; Cotter M; Matsuura M; Relph N; Tarmey NT; Stein DM J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2015 Feb; 78(2):295-9. PubMed ID: 25757113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Randomized Cadaver Study Comparing First-Attempt Success Between Tibial and Humeral Intraosseous Insertions Using NIO Device by Paramedics: A Preliminary Investigation. Szarpak L; Truszewski Z; Smereka J; Krajewski P; Fudalej M; Adamczyk P; Czyzewski L Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(20):e3724. PubMed ID: 27196493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraosseous vascular access in adults using the EZ-IO in an emergency department. Ngo AS; Oh JJ; Chen Y; Yong D; Ong ME Int J Emerg Med; 2009 Aug; 2(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 20157465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two different intraosseous access methods in a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service - a quality assurance study. Sørgjerd R; Sunde GA; Heltne JK Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2019 Feb; 27(1):15. PubMed ID: 30760297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraosseous access EZ-IO in a prehospital emergency service. Torres F; Galán MD; Alonso Mdel M; Suárez R; Camacho C; Almagro V J Emerg Nurs; 2013 Sep; 39(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 23099011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of proximal tibia, distal femur, and proximal humerus infusion rates using the EZ-IO intraosseous device on the adult swine (Sus scrofa) model. Lairet J; Bebarta V; Lairet K; Kacprowicz R; Lawler C; Pitotti R; Bush A; King J Prehosp Emerg Care; 2013; 17(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 23331182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service. Helm M; Haunstein B; Schlechtriemen T; Ruppert M; Lampl L; Gäßler M Resuscitation; 2015 Mar; 88():43-7. PubMed ID: 25553609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An observational, prospective study to determine the ease of vascular access in adults using a novel intraosseous access device. Ong ME; Ngo AS; Wijaya R Ann Acad Med Singap; 2009 Feb; 38(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 19271038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation in the emergency department: A prospective, randomized study. Leidel BA; Kirchhoff C; Braunstein V; Bogner V; Biberthaler P; Kanz KG Resuscitation; 2010 Aug; 81(8):994-9. PubMed ID: 20434823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The association of tibial vs. humeral intraosseous vascular access with patient outcomes in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Brebner C; Asamoah-Boaheng M; Zaidel B; Yap J; Scheuermeyer F; Mok V; Christian M; Kawano T; Singh L; van Diepen S; Christenson J; Grunau B Resuscitation; 2023 Dec; 193():110031. PubMed ID: 37923113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial. Reades R; Studnek JR; Vandeventer S; Garrett J Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Dec; 58(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 21856044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of first-attempt success between tibial and humeral intraosseous insertions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Reades R; Studnek JR; Garrett JS; Vandeventer S; Blackwell T Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(2):278-81. PubMed ID: 21275573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in a pre-hospital emergency service: A prospective study and review of the literature. Santos D; Carron PN; Yersin B; Pasquier M Resuscitation; 2013 Apr; 84(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 23160104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]