BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19042035)

  • 1. Comparison of Electroaudiometry with cochlear implant in children with inner ear anomaly.
    Takanami T; Ito K; Yamasoba T; Kaga K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jan; 73(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 19042035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.
    Papsin BC
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. PubMed ID: 15626926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in cochlear implantation of children with inner ear malformations.
    Kim AH; Kileny PR; Arts HA; El-Kashlan HK; Telian SA; Zwolan TA
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):626-34. PubMed ID: 18520627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Internal auditory canal morphology in children with cochlear nerve deficiency.
    Adunka OF; Roush PA; Teagle HF; Brown CJ; Zdanski CJ; Jewells V; Buchman CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Sep; 27(6):793-801. PubMed ID: 16936566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loss of residual hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Boggess WJ; Baker JE; Balkany TJ
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Oct; 99(10 Pt 1):1002-5. PubMed ID: 2796546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting cochlear implant outcomes in children with auditory neuropathy.
    Walton J; Gibson WP; Sanli H; Prelog K
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Apr; 29(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 18317399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of cochlear implant electrode insertion on middle-ear function as measured by intra-operative laser Doppler vibrometry.
    Donnelly N; Bibas A; Jiang D; Bamiou DE; Santulli C; Jeronimidis G; Fitzgerald O'Connor A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jul; 123(7):723-9. PubMed ID: 19138455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Partial deafness cochlear implantation in children.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Anderson I
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1407-13. PubMed ID: 17597232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [An overview of the studies on combined electric and acoustic stimulation of auditory system].
    Guan T; Zhu Z; Ye D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 26(5):1146-9. PubMed ID: 19947508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lexical tone perception ability of profoundly hearing-impaired children: performance of cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Lee KY; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1079-87. PubMed ID: 20634774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Representation of acoustic signals in the human cochlea in presence of a cochlear implant electrode.
    Kiefer J; Böhnke F; Adunka O; Arnold W
    Hear Res; 2006 Nov; 221(1-2):36-43. PubMed ID: 16962268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of hearing performance in cochlear implant patients].
    Yücel EA; Erdil A; Keleş N; Solmaz MA; Değer K
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2002; 9(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 12471280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Residual hearing thresholds in cochlear implantation and reimplantation.
    Di Nardo W; Cantore I; Cianfrone F; Melillo P; Rigante M; Paludetti G
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 17259703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of promontory and cochlear implants within a single subject.
    Edgerton BJ; House WF; Doyle KJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):100-3. PubMed ID: 6805388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Within- and across-channel gap detection in cochlear implant listeners.
    Grose JH; Buss E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3651-8. PubMed ID: 18247772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in cochlear implant children.
    Jin Y; Nakamura M; Shinjo Y; Kaga K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Feb; 126(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 16428194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.