187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19043138)
1. Bone formation in a carbonate-substituted hydroxyapatite implant is inhibited by zoledronate: the importance of bioresorption to osteoconduction.
Spence G; Phillips S; Campion C; Brooks R; Rushton N
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Dec; 90(12):1635-40. PubMed ID: 19043138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of carbonate substitution on the ultrastructural characteristics of hydroxyapatite implants.
Porter A; Patel N; Brooks R; Best S; Rushton N; Bonfield W
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2005 Oct; 16(10):899-907. PubMed ID: 16167098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osteoblast and osteoclast responses to A/B type carbonate-substituted hydroxyapatite ceramics for bone regeneration.
Germaini MM; Detsch R; Grünewald A; Magnaudeix A; Lalloue F; Boccaccini AR; Champion E
Biomed Mater; 2017 Jun; 12(3):035008. PubMed ID: 28351999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carbonate substituted hydroxyapatite: resorption by osteoclasts modifies the osteoblastic response.
Spence G; Patel N; Brooks R; Rushton N
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jul; 90(1):217-24. PubMed ID: 18496864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Osteoclastogenesis on hydroxyapatite ceramics: the effect of carbonate substitution.
Spence G; Patel N; Brooks R; Bonfield W; Rushton N
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Mar; 92(4):1292-300. PubMed ID: 19343778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of enhancement of bone ingrowth into hydroxyapatite ceramics with highly and poorly interconnected pores by electrical polarization.
Wang W; Itoh S; Tanaka Y; Nagai A; Yamashita K
Acta Biomater; 2009 Oct; 5(8):3132-40. PubMed ID: 19426842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative in vivo study of six hydroxyapatite-based bone graft substitutes.
Habibovic P; Kruyt MC; Juhl MV; Clyens S; Martinetti R; Dolcini L; Theilgaard N; van Blitterswijk CA
J Orthop Res; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1363-70. PubMed ID: 18404698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone in-growth induced by biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic in femoral defect of dogs.
Manjubala I; Sastry TP; Kumar RV
J Biomater Appl; 2005 Apr; 19(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 15788429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of sintered silicate-substituted hydroxyapatite on remodelling processes at the bone-implant interface.
Porter AE; Patel N; Skepper JN; Best SM; Bonfield W
Biomaterials; 2004 Jul; 25(16):3303-14. PubMed ID: 14980425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Keratin-hydroxyapatite composites: biocompatibility, osseointegration, and physical properties in an ovine model.
Dias GJ; Mahoney P; Swain M; Kelly RJ; Smith RA; Ali MA
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Dec; 95(4):1084-95. PubMed ID: 20878901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [An experimental study of the action of an intraosseous implant of hydroxylapatite ceramic granules on the processes of reparative bone formation (experimental morphological research)].
Grigor'ian AS; Ivanov VS; Panikarovskiĭ VV; Sabantseva EG; Antipova ZP; Khamraev TK
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1994; 73(3):7-10. PubMed ID: 7846724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of bone formation in biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and hydroxyapatite (HA) implanted in muscle and bone of dogs at different time periods.
Yuan H; van Blitterswijk CA; de Groot K; de Bruijn JD
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Jul; 78(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 16619253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro osteoclast formation and resorption of silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite ceramics.
Friederichs RJ; Brooks RA; Ueda M; Best SM
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2015 Oct; 103(10):3312-22. PubMed ID: 25847383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prefabrication of vascularized bone graft using a combination of fibroblast growth factor-2 and vascular bundle implantation into a novel interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic.
Nakasa T; Ishida O; Sunagawa T; Nakamae A; Yasunaga Y; Agung M; Ochi M
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2005 Nov; 75(2):350-5. PubMed ID: 16088890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of three different calcium phosphate implant coatings on bone deposition and coating resorption: a long-term histological study in sheep.
Schopper C; Moser D; Goriwoda W; Ziya-Ghazvini F; Spassova E; Lagogiannis G; Auterith A; Ewers R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Jun; 16(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 15877757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone response inside free-form fabricated macroporous hydroxyapatite scaffolds with and without an open microporosity.
Malmström J; Adolfsson E; Arvidsson A; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 17535331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of the systemic administration of alendronate on bone formation in a porous hydroxyapatite/collagen composite and resorption by osteoclasts in a bone defect model in rabbits.
Sugata Y; Sotome S; Yuasa M; Hirano M; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Apr; 93(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 21464492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of glycerol-L-lactide coating polymer on bone ingrowth of bFGF-coated hydroxyapatite implants.
Alt V; Pfefferle HJ; Kreuter J; Stahl JP; Pavlidis T; Meyer C; Mockwitz J; Wenisch S; Schnettler R
J Control Release; 2004 Sep; 99(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 15342184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new in vivo screening model for posterior spinal bone formation: comparison of ten calcium phosphate ceramic material treatments.
Wilson CE; Kruyt MC; de Bruijn JD; van Blitterswijk CA; Oner FC; Verbout AJ; Dhert WJ
Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(3):302-14. PubMed ID: 16111745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
