832 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19043674)
21. [Why is the scientometric gap widening? Deterioration of the scientific parameters of surgical specialties].
Harsányi L; Weltner J; Zaránd A
Magy Seb; 2013 Feb; 66(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 23428722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The impact of ophthalmology.
Duffel PG; Weingeist TA
Ophthalmology; 2009 Aug; 116(8):1423-4. PubMed ID: 19651309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [H-index--a good measure of research activity?].
Hagve TA
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2011 Dec; 131(24):2494-6. PubMed ID: 22170140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Factors of evaluation and interaction of scientific journals--impact factor and interjournal impact factor].
Bojko K
Wiad Lek; 2007; 60(1-2):98-104. PubMed ID: 17607979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multi-authors' self-citation: a further impact factor bias?
Sala SD; Brooks J
Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1139-45. PubMed ID: 18708185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Aiming high.
Baum BJ; Scully C
Oral Dis; 2009 Jan; 15(1):1. PubMed ID: 19076469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Overzealous use of decimal places has wrong kind of impact.
Coey JM
Nature; 2009 Sep; 461(7263):470. PubMed ID: 19779429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Past and future of the Revista de Investigación Clínica].
Gamba G; García-Romero MT; Venado A
Rev Invest Clin; 2008; 60(6):442-50. PubMed ID: 19408423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Impact factor, its variants and its influence in academic promotion].
Puche RC
Medicina (B Aires); 2011; 71(5):484-9. PubMed ID: 22057180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Research activities of candidates with Ph.D. degree or doctoral degree from Danish medical faculties, 1995-1997].
Jørgensen HL; Larsen B; Ingwersen P; Rehfeld JF
Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Feb; 166(6):479-84. PubMed ID: 15045714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Is the impact factor the only game in town?
Smart P
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2015 Sep; 97(6):405-8. PubMed ID: 26320762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact factors: letting everyone have their say.
Cobb M
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Does the impact factor the single suitable criteria to judge the quality of a scientific paper?].
Cynober L
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2002; 60(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 12050039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact factors in scientific journals.
Hemmingsson A; Edgren J; Mygind T; Skjennald A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 May; 15(5):619. PubMed ID: 11997905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Anales and the impact factor].
Rodríguez Soriano J
An Esp Pediatr; 1997 Sep; 47(3):234. PubMed ID: 9499273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Journals: impact factors are too highly valued.
Davies J
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):210. PubMed ID: 12529611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Research productivity among nations.
Demaria A
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 54(25):2460-2. PubMed ID: 20082938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [We wish more professional debate about the bibliometric research indicators].
Søndergaard J; Mouritzen PE; Olesen SP; Molin S; Fink H; Blaabjerg F; Sivertsen G
Ugeskr Laeger; 2010 Mar; 172(12):984; author reply 984. PubMed ID: 20376986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Open access publishing, NIH policy and the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine.
Quan SF
J Clin Sleep Med; 2005 Jul; 1(3):233-4. PubMed ID: 17566181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The positive and negative impacts, and dangers of the impact factor.
Scully C
Community Dent Health; 2007 Sep; 24(3):130-4. PubMed ID: 17958071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
