These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19044321)
1. Consistency check of planned adaptive option on helical tomotherapy. Schirm M; Yartsev S; Bauman G; Battista J; Van Dyk J Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Dec; 7(6):425-32. PubMed ID: 19044321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiobiological and dosimetric analysis of daily megavoltage CT registration on adaptive radiotherapy with Helical Tomotherapy. Mavroidis P; Su FC; Giantsoudi D; Stathakis S; Komisopoulos G; Shi C; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Feb; 10(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21214283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. KVCT, MVCT, and hybrid CT image studies--treatment planning and dose delivery equivalence on helical tomotherapy. Martin S; Yartsev S Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2847-54. PubMed ID: 20632596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification. McDermott LN; Wendling M; van Asselen B; Stroom J; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3921-30. PubMed ID: 17089854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of tomotherapy treatment planning for patients with bilateral hip prostheses. Chapman D; Smith S; Barnett R; Bauman G; Yartsev S Radiat Oncol; 2014 Feb; 9():43. PubMed ID: 24491230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures. Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric impacts of gantry angle misalignment on prostate cancer treatment using helical tomotherapy. Su FC; Shi C; Crownover R; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Aug; 7(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 18642967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Helical tomotherapy versus single-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy: a collaborative dosimetric comparison between two institutions. Rong Y; Tang G; Welsh JS; Mohiuddin MM; Paliwal B; Yu CX Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):284-96. PubMed ID: 21236598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Independent calculation of dose distributions for helical tomotherapy using a conventional treatment planning system. Klüter S; Schubert K; Lissner S; Sterzing F; Oetzel D; Debus J; Schlegel W; Oelfke U; Nill S Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081709. PubMed ID: 25086519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation. Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of megavoltage computed tomographic scan methodology on setup verification and adaptive dose calculation in helical TomoTherapy. Zhu J; Bai T; Gu J; Sun Z; Wei Y; Li B; Yin Y Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 13(1):80. PubMed ID: 29699582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Helical tomotherapy-based STAT RT: Dosimetric evaluation for clinical implementation of a rapid radiation palliation program. McIntosh A; Dunlap N; Sheng K; Geezey C; Turner B; Blackhall L; Weiss G; Lappinen E; Larner JM; Read PW Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 19944589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design and implementation of a water phantom for IMRT, arc therapy, and tomotherapy dose distribution measurements. Pallotta S; Marrazzo L; Bucciolini M Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3724-31. PubMed ID: 17985617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of a computational method for assessing the impact of intra-fraction motion on helical tomotherapy plans. Ngwa W; Meeks SL; Kupelian PA; Schnarr E; Langen KM Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(21):6611-21. PubMed ID: 19826197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Helical tomotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma-any advantages over conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy? Wu WC; Mui WL; Fung WK Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19931024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric effects of rotational output variation and x-ray target degradation on helical tomotherapy plans. Staton RJ; Langen KM; Kupelian PA; Meeks SL Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2881-8. PubMed ID: 19673187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of IMRT treatment plans between linac and helical tomotherapy based on integral dose and inhomogeneity index. Shi C; Peñagarícano J; Papanikolaou N Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 18674686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Helical tomotherapy planning for lung cancer based on ventilation magnetic resonance imaging. Cai J; McLawhorn R; Altes TA; de Lange E; Read PW; Larner JM; Benedict SH; Sheng K Med Dosim; 2011; 36(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 21377866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of plan quality provided by intensity-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy. Cao D; Holmes TW; Afghan MK; Shepard DM Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 17707278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential benefits of dosimetric VMAT tracking verified with 3D film measurements. Crijns W; Defraene G; Van Herck H; Depuydt T; Haustermans K; Maes F; Van den Heuvel F Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2162. PubMed ID: 27147328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]