BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19045520)

  • 1. A dynamic analytical model for impact evaluation of percutaneous implants.
    Swain R; Faulkner G; Raboud D; Wolfaardt J
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051013. PubMed ID: 19045520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulation of impact test for determining "health" of percutaneous bone anchored implants.
    Jones S; Faulkner G; Raboud D; Fyfe K; Wolfaardt J
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):647-53. PubMed ID: 16995750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Extended push-out test to characterize the failure of bone-implant interface].
    Brandt J; Bierögel C; Holweg K; Hein W; Grellmann W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Jun; 50(6):201-6. PubMed ID: 16003922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of implant movement checker for determining dental implant stability.
    Wijaya SK; Oka H; Saratani K; Sumikawa T; Kawazoe T
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Jul; 26(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 15234687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical and interfacial bone changes around a non-cemented hip implant: simulations using a combined strain/damage remodelling algorithm.
    Scannell PT; Prendergast PJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):477-88. PubMed ID: 19188086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resonance frequency analysis of implants in the guinea pig model: influence of boundary conditions and orientation of the transducer.
    Pattijn V; Jaecques SV; De Smet E; Muraru L; Van Lierde C; Van der Perre G; Naert I; Vander Sloten J
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 16597507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An improved impact technique for monitoring percutaneous implant integrity.
    Swain R; Faulkner G; Raboud D; Wolfaardt J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 18548922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational simulation of dental implant osseointegration through resonance frequency analysis.
    Pérez MA; Moreo P; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(2):316-25. PubMed ID: 17976627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Natural frequency analysis of osseointegration for trans-femoral implant.
    Shao F; Xu W; Crocombe A; Ewins D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 35(5):817-24. PubMed ID: 17377843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using simulation methods for orthopaedic implant design.
    Rickey L
    Med Device Technol; 2009 Sep; 20(5):46-7. PubMed ID: 19852183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Limiting models for calcification in fibrous tissues adjacent to orthopedic implants: variational indicator functions and influences of implant stiffness.
    Harrigan TP
    Bull Math Biol; 1998 Jul; 60(4):615-46. PubMed ID: 9659008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anatomical hip model for the mechanical testing of hip protectors.
    Derler S; Spierings AB; Schmitt KU
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jul; 27(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 15990064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of prosthesis design and impression techniques on human cortical bone strain around oral implants under load.
    Akça K; Kokat AM; Sahin S; Iplikcioglu H; Cehreli MC
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Sep; 31(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 19269878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of modelling to predict implant behaviour.
    Ong K; Kurtz S
    Med Device Technol; 2008 Sep; 19(5):64-6. PubMed ID: 18947155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histomorphometric evaluation of implant design as a key factor in peri-implant bone response: a preliminary study in a dog model.
    Orsini E; Salgarello S; Bubalo M; Lazic Z; Trire A; Martini D; Franchi M; Ruggeri A
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Jun; 58(6):263-75. PubMed ID: 19516235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around immediately-loaded implants supporting mandibular fixed prostheses.
    Kökat AM; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Akkocaoğlu M; Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Implant Dent; 2009 Apr; 18(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 19359867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a soft tissue seal around bone-anchored transcutaneous amputation prostheses.
    Pendegrass CJ; Goodship AE; Blunn GW
    Biomaterials; 2006 Aug; 27(23):4183-91. PubMed ID: 16618500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interface parameters of impact-induced mild traumatic brain injury.
    Fijalkowski RJ; Ellingson BM; Stemper BD; Yoganandan N; Gennarelli TA; Pintar FA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2006; 42():108-13. PubMed ID: 16817594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.