161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19045652)
1. Effect of the cochlear microphonic on the limiting frequency of the mammalian ear.
Iwasa KH; Sul B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1607-12. PubMed ID: 19045652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-frequency motility of outer hair cells and the cochlear amplifier.
Dallos P; Evans BN
Science; 1995 Mar; 267(5206):2006-9. PubMed ID: 7701325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Limiting frequency of the cochlear amplifier based on electromotility of outer hair cells.
Ospeck M; Dong XX; Iwasa KH
Biophys J; 2003 Feb; 84(2 Pt 1):739-49. PubMed ID: 12547758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outer hair cell active force generation in the cochlear environment.
Liao Z; Feng S; Popel AS; Brownell WE; Spector AA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2215-25. PubMed ID: 17902857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The interplay between active hair bundle motility and electromotility in the cochlea.
O Maoiléidigh D; Jülicher F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1175-90. PubMed ID: 20815454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Loud sound-induced changes in cochlear mechanics.
Fridberger A; Zheng J; Parthasarathi A; Ren T; Nuttall A
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Nov; 88(5):2341-8. PubMed ID: 12424275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cochlear transducer operating point adaptation.
Zou Y; Zheng J; Ren T; Nuttall A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2232-41. PubMed ID: 16642838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ca2+ current-driven nonlinear amplification by the mammalian cochlea in vitro.
Chan DK; Hudspeth AJ
Nat Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 8(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 15643426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of modulation of basilar membrane position on the cochlear microphonic.
Pierson M; Møller A
Hear Res; 1980 Mar; 2(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 7364670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Brief report: the cochlear microphonic as an indication of outer hair cell function.
Withnell RH
Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 11271978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chlorpromazine inhibits cochlear function in guinea pigs.
Oghalai JS
Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):59-68. PubMed ID: 15567603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large endolymphatic potentials from low-frequency and infrasonic tones in the guinea pig.
Salt AN; Lichtenhan JT; Gill RM; Hartsock JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1561-71. PubMed ID: 23464026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-frequency characteristics of intracellularly recorded receptor potentials in guinea-pig cochlear hair cells.
Russell IJ; Sellick PM
J Physiol; 1983 May; 338():179-206. PubMed ID: 6875955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A model of cochlear micromechanics.
Fukazawa T
Hear Res; 1997 Nov; 113(1-2):182-90. PubMed ID: 9387997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-frequency electromotile responses in the cochlea.
Grosh K; Zheng J; Zou Y; de Boer E; Nuttall AL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2178-84. PubMed ID: 15139629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A model of cochlear mechanics with outer hair cell motility.
Neely ST
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jul; 94(1):137-46. PubMed ID: 8354757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of transducer operating point on distortion generation in the cochlea.
Sirjani DB; Salt AN; Gill RM; Hale SA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Mar; 115(3):1219-29. PubMed ID: 15058343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A parametric study of cochlear input impedance.
Puria S; Allen JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):287-309. PubMed ID: 2002170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integration of outer hair cell activity in a one-dimensional cochlear model.
Cohen A; Furst M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2185-92. PubMed ID: 15139630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibrations in living mouse cochleae.
Ren T; He W; Kemp D
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Aug; 113(35):9910-5. PubMed ID: 27516544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
