BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19045653)

  • 1. Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries.
    Long GR; Talmadge CL; Lee J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1613-26. PubMed ID: 19045653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of aspirin on distortion product fine structure: interpreted by the two-source model for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generation.
    Rao A; Long GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):792-800. PubMed ID: 21361438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extraction of sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by onset-decomposition.
    Vetesník A; Turcanu D; Dalhoff E; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):21-38. PubMed ID: 19523509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Müller J; Janssen T; Zenner HP
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of acoustic distortion products in clinical diagnosis. The site of origin of otoacoustic emissions in the inner ear].
    Plinkert PK; Harris FP; Probst R
    HNO; 1993 Jul; 41(7):339-44. PubMed ID: 8376180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear nonlinearity in normal-hearing subjects as inferred psychophysically and from distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Johannesen PT; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2149-63. PubMed ID: 19062855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and basilar membrane vibration in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.
    Rhode WS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2725-37. PubMed ID: 18189565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correspondence between behavioral and individually "optimized" otoacoustic emission estimates of human cochlear input/output curves.
    Johannesen PT; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3602-13. PubMed ID: 20550260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures.
    Williams EJ; Bacon SP
    Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):44-54. PubMed ID: 15721560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency-change in DPOAE evoked by 1 s/octave sweeping primaries in newborns and adults.
    AlMakadma HA; Henin S; Prieve BA; Dyab WM; Long GR
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():157-65. PubMed ID: 26318364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of aspirin on phase gradient of 2F1-F2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Parazzini M; Hall AJ; Lutman ME; Kapadia S
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):44-52. PubMed ID: 15953514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1.
    Mauermann M; Uppenkamp S; van Hengel PW; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3473-83. PubMed ID: 10615687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression.
    Sun XM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overexposure effects of a 1-kHz tone on the distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Reuter K; Ordoñez R; Hammershoi D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):378-86. PubMed ID: 17614497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sources and mechanisms of DPOAE generation: implications for the prediction of auditory sensitivity.
    Shaffer LA; Withnell RH; Dhar S; Lilly DJ; Goodman SS; Harmon KM
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):367-79. PubMed ID: 14534408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in amplitude and phase of distortion-product otoacoustic emission fine-structure and separated components during efferent activation.
    Henin S; Thompson S; Abdelrazeq S; Long GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2068-79. PubMed ID: 21476662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.