BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19045792)

  • 1. The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms.
    Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3064-75. PubMed ID: 19045792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An energetic limit on spatial release from masking.
    Best V; Thompson ER; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 14(4):603-10. PubMed ID: 23649712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids in solving the cocktail party problem.
    Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G
    Trends Amplif; 2008 Dec; 12(4):300-15. PubMed ID: 19010794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.
    Braza MD; Corbin NE; Buss E; Monson BB
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34260434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech perception in older hearing impaired listeners: benefits of perceptual training.
    Woods DL; Doss Z; Herron TJ; Arbogast T; Younus M; Ettlinger M; Yund EW
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0113965. PubMed ID: 25730330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors underlying masking release by voice-gender differences and spatial separation cues in multi-talker listening environments in listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Oh Y; Hartling CL; Srinivasan NK; Diedesch AC; Gallun FJ; Reiss LAJ
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1059639. PubMed ID: 36507363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial Release From Masking Under Different Reverberant Conditions in Young and Elderly Subjects: Effect of Moving or Stationary Maskers at Circular and Radial Conditions.
    Muñoz RV; Aspöck L; Fels J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 62(9):3582-3595. PubMed ID: 31525113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Release from masking for small spatial separations: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Srinivasan NK; Jakien KM; Gallun FJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):EL73. PubMed ID: 27475216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial Release from Masking Using Clinical Corpora: Sentence Recognition in a Colocated or Spatially Separated Speech Masker.
    King G; Corbin NE; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):271-276. PubMed ID: 31589139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validating a Rapid, Automated Test of Spatial Release From Masking.
    Jakien KM; Kampel SD; Stansell MM; Gallun FJ
    Am J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 26(4):507-518. PubMed ID: 28973106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Competing Voices Test for Hearing-Impaired Listeners Applied to Spatial Separation and Ideal Time-Frequency Masks.
    Bramsløw L; Vatti M; Rossing R; Naithani G; Henrik Pontoppidan N
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519848288. PubMed ID: 31104580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on visually guided attention in a multitalker environment.
    Best V; Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Mar; 10(1):142-9. PubMed ID: 19009321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.
    Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2246-56. PubMed ID: 15139635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.