These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19045792)

  • 21. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
    Calandruccio L; Buss E; Bowdrie K
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Roverud E; Swaminathan J; Jennings T; Clayton K; Steven Colburn H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan; 145(1):440. PubMed ID: 30710924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial Release From Informational Masking: Evidence From Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy.
    Zhang M; Mary Ying YL; Ihlefeld A
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518817464. PubMed ID: 30558491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Listening through hearing aids affects spatial perception and speech intelligibility in normal-hearing listeners.
    Cubick J; Buchholz JM; Best V; Lavandier M; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2896. PubMed ID: 30522291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical Assessment of Functional Hearing Deficits: Speech-in-Noise Performance.
    Phatak SA; Brungart DS; Zion DJ; Grant KW
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 30134353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task.
    Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1146-58. PubMed ID: 18681603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.
    Jensen KK; Bernstein JGW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2113. PubMed ID: 31046298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Method for Assessing Auditory Spatial Analysis in Reverberant Multitalker Environments.
    Weller T; Best V; Buchholz JM; Young T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jul; 27(7):601-11. PubMed ID: 27406665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Effect of Sound Localization on Auditory-Only and Audiovisual Speech Recognition in a Simulated Multitalker Environment.
    Sheffield SW; Wheeler HJ; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231186040. PubMed ID: 37415497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Benefits of Increased Sensation Level and Bandwidth for Spatial Release From Masking.
    Jakien KM; Kampel SD; Gordon SY; Gallun FJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e13-e21. PubMed ID: 27556520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.
    Zhang J; Wang X; Wang NY; Fu X; Gan T; Galvin JJ; Willis S; Xu K; Thomas M; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug; 63(8):2801-2810. PubMed ID: 32692939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech detection in spatial and nonspatial speech maskers.
    Balakrishnan U; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2680-91. PubMed ID: 18529187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech.
    Freyman RL; Helfer KS; McCall DD; Clifton RK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3578-88. PubMed ID: 10615698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Aging and speech-on-speech masking.
    Helfer KS; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 18091104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of early and late reflections on spatial release from masking: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Srinivasan NK; Stansell M; Gallun FJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL185. PubMed ID: 28372125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of Simulated and Profound Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Recognition of Speech in Competing Speech.
    Asp F; Reinfeldt S
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):411-419. PubMed ID: 31356386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.
    Misurelli SM; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):319-31. PubMed ID: 26233032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aided speech-identification performance in single-talker competition by older adults with impaired hearing.
    Humes LE; Coughlin M
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):485-94. PubMed ID: 19778396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.