These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19045803)

  • 1. Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant.
    Matthies ML; Guenther FH; Denny M; Perkell JS; Burton E; Vick J; Lane H; Tiede M; Zandipour M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3191-202. PubMed ID: 19045803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vowel intelligibility in children with cochlear implants: An acoustic and articulatory study.
    Turgeon C; Trudeau-Fisette P; Fitzpatrick E; Ménard L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():87-96. PubMed ID: 28964317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users.
    Perkell JS; Denny M; Lane H; Guenther F; Matthies ML; Tiede M; Vick J; Zandipour M; Burton E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):505-18. PubMed ID: 17297804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intelligibility of the Patient's Speech Predicts the Likelihood of Cochlear Implant Success in Prelingually Deaf Adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e302-10. PubMed ID: 26928004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Covariation of cochlear implant users' perception and production of vowel contrasts and their identification by listeners with normal hearing.
    Vick JC; Lane H; Perkell JS; Matthies ML; Gould J; Zandipour M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 44(6):1257-67. PubMed ID: 11776363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in speech intelligibility of postlingually deaf adults after cochlear implantation.
    Gould J; Lane H; Vick J; Perkell JS; Matthies ML; Zandipour M
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):453-60. PubMed ID: 11770668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic and articulatory measures of sibilant production with and without auditory feedback from a cochlear implant.
    Matthies ML; Svirsky M; Perkell J; Lane H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Oct; 39(5):936-46. PubMed ID: 8898248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of speech production in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Poissant SF; Peters KA; Robb MP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16460814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Lombard effect observed in speech produced by cochlear implant users in noisy environments: A naturalistic study.
    Lee J; Ali H; Ziaei A; Tobey EA; Hansen JHL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2788. PubMed ID: 28464686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller S; Zhang Y; Nelson P
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26928002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do adults with cochlear implants rely on different acoustic cues for phoneme perception than adults with normal hearing?
    Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Tarr E; Caldwell-Tarr A; Welling DB; Shahin AJ; Nittrouer S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):566-82. PubMed ID: 24686722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
    Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of real-time cochlear implant simulation on speech production.
    Casserly ED
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2791-800. PubMed ID: 25994707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of bite blocks and hearing status on vowel production.
    Lane H; Denny M; Guenther FH; Matthies ML; Menard L; Perkell JS; Stockmann E; Tiede M; Vic J; Zandipour M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1636-46. PubMed ID: 16240823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interactions of speaking condition and auditory feedback on vowel production in postlingually deaf adults with cochlear implants.
    Ménard L; Polak M; Denny M; Burton E; Lane H; Matthies ML; Marrone N; Perkell JS; Tiede M; Vick J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3790-801. PubMed ID: 17552727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.