These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19045809)

  • 1. Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise.
    Lu Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3261-75. PubMed ID: 19045809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers.
    Cooke M; Lu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2059-69. PubMed ID: 20968376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions.
    Hazan V; Baker R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2139-52. PubMed ID: 21973368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception.
    Cooke M; Garcia Lecumberri ML; Barker J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):414-27. PubMed ID: 18177170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
    Markham D; Hazan V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners.
    Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.
    Ferguson SH; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1241-55. PubMed ID: 17905909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): speech intelligibility in noise.
    Rao MD; Letowski T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 16518140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility.
    Yi H; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4269-4281. PubMed ID: 31738862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between talker acoustics, intelligibility, and effort in degraded listening conditions.
    Paulus M; Hazan V; Adank P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3348. PubMed ID: 32486777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
    Gilbert RC; Chandrasekaran B; Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 24437779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity.
    Pinet M; Iverson P; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1063-76. PubMed ID: 18247908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):391-409. PubMed ID: 17469975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Categorical dependence of vowel detection in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4539-46. PubMed ID: 18537402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A recommendation for calibration and choice of masking noises used in speech audiometry].
    Ingold L; Tschopp K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Jun; 71(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 1637453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.