155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19045979)
1. Better to take one long or two quick looks? Independent processing of evidence from discrete visual presentations.
Schwarz W; Kühn S
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1337-52. PubMed ID: 19045979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporal integration in face perception: evidence of configural processing of temporally separated face parts.
Anaki D; Boyd J; Moscovitch M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 17311475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual working memory capacity for objects from different categories: a face-specific maintenance effect.
Wong JH; Peterson MS; Thompson JC
Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):719-31. PubMed ID: 18675409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attention and the detection of masked radial frequency patterns: Data and model.
Smith PL; Lee YE; Wolfgang BJ; Ratcliff R
Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1363-77. PubMed ID: 18538812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of contrast polarity in paracontrast masking.
Kafaligönül H; Breitmeyer BG; Ogmen H
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1576-87. PubMed ID: 19801617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fixation identification: the optimum threshold for a dispersion algorithm.
Blignaut P
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):881-95. PubMed ID: 19429966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects.
Hommuk K; Bachmann T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of exposure duration on visual character identification in single, whole, and partial report.
Petersen A; Andersen TS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):498-514. PubMed ID: 22288689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Individual differences in infant visual attention: are short lookers faster processors or feature processors?
Colombo J; Mitchell DW; Coldren JT; Freeseman LJ
Child Dev; 1991 Dec; 62(6):1247-57. PubMed ID: 1786713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor.
Varakin DA; Levin DT
Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):51-77. PubMed ID: 16464287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The importance of information localization in scene gist recognition.
Loschky LC; Sethi A; Simons DJ; Pydimarri TN; Ochs D; Corbeille JL
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1431-50. PubMed ID: 18085955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lack of set size effects in spatial updating: Evidence for offline updating.
Hodgson E; Waller D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):854-66. PubMed ID: 16822153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of temporal integration on the shape of visual backward masking functions.
Francis G; Cho YS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1116-28. PubMed ID: 18823199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The nature of change detection and online representations of scenes.
Ryan JD; Cohen NJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):988-1015. PubMed ID: 15462635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speed limits: orientation and semantic context interactions constrain natural scene discrimination dynamics.
Rieger JW; Köchy N; Schalk F; Grüschow M; Heinze HJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):56-76. PubMed ID: 18248140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of short and long exposure duration and dual-tasking on a global-local task.
Andres AJ; Fernandes MA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):247-66. PubMed ID: 16413493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Timing of multiple overlapping intervals: how many clocks do we have?
van Rijn H; Taatgen NA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 18849020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual search is postponed during the attentional blink until the system is suitably reconfigured.
Ghorashi SM; Smilek D; Di Lollo V
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):124-36. PubMed ID: 17311483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the spatial metric of short-SOA costs of exogenous cuing.
Chen P; Moore C; Mordkoff JT
Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 18510134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploiting degrees of inflectional ambiguity: stem form and the time course of morphological processing.
Järvikivi J; Pyykkönen P; Niemi J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):221-37. PubMed ID: 19210092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
