BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19045988)

  • 1. Understanding action beyond imitation: reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action.
    van Schie HT; van Waterschoot BM; Bekkering H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1493-500. PubMed ID: 19045988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions.
    Chong TT; Cunnington R; Williams MA; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):786-95. PubMed ID: 19124033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions.
    Welsh TN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):726-37. PubMed ID: 19674802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the flexibility of action-perception coupling.
    Poljac E; van Schie HT; Bekkering H
    Psychol Res; 2009 Jul; 73(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 19347358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hand to mouth: automatic imitation across effector systems.
    Leighton J; Heyes C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1174-83. PubMed ID: 20731510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To point a finger: attentional and motor consequences of observing pointing movements.
    Belopolsky AV; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 17997387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions.
    Bertenthal BI; Longo MR; Kosobud A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):210-25. PubMed ID: 16634666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological issues in measures of imitative reaction times.
    Aicken MD; Wilson AD; Williams JH; Mon-Williams M
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Apr; 63(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 17070640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of Oxytocin on automatic motor simulation.
    De Coster L; Mueller SC; T'Sjoen G; De Saedeleer L; Brass M
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2014 Dec; 50():220-6. PubMed ID: 25240207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of irrelevant stimulus orientation on visually guided grasping movements.
    Wühr P; Elsner B
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 121(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17469919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic imitation of intransitive actions.
    Press C; Bird G; Walsh E; Heyes C
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18077067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do humans ape? Or do apes human? Imitation and intention in humans (Homo sapiens) and other animals.
    Horowitz AC
    J Comp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 117(3):325-36. PubMed ID: 14498809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic imitation of biomechanically possible and impossible actions: effects of priming movements versus goals.
    Longo MR; Kosobud A; Bertenthal BI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):489-501. PubMed ID: 18377184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simple movement imitation: are kinematic features sufficient to map perceptions into actions?
    Noy L; Rumiati RI; Flash T
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Mar; 69(2):360-8. PubMed ID: 18834653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'Goals' are not an integral component of imitation.
    Leighton J; Bird G; Heyes C
    Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):423-35. PubMed ID: 19945096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Covert imitation of transitive actions activates effector-independent motor representations affecting "motor" knowledge of target-object properties.
    Campione GC; Gentilucci M
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 207(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 19850083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets.
    Wykowska A; Hommel B; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1034-41. PubMed ID: 21472508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience-based priming of body parts: a study of action imitation.
    Gillmeister H; Catmur C; Liepelt R; Brass M; Heyes C
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1217():157-70. PubMed ID: 18502404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A dynamic model for action understanding and goal-directed imitation.
    Erlhagen W; Mukovskiy A; Bicho E
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1083(1):174-88. PubMed ID: 16616516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.