These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19046150)

  • 1. Go or no-go? Developmental improvements in the efficiency of response inhibition in mid-childhood.
    Cragg L; Nation K
    Dev Sci; 2008 Nov; 11(6):819-27. PubMed ID: 19046150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural correlates of successful and partial inhibitions in children: an ERP study.
    Cragg L; Fox A; Nation K; Reid C; Anderson M
    Dev Psychobiol; 2009 Nov; 51(7):533-43. PubMed ID: 19685486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task switching and shifting between stopping and going: Developmental change in between-trial control adjustments.
    Huizinga M; van der Molen MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Mar; 108(3):484-503. PubMed ID: 21092983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in intellectually gifted children: a Go/NoGo study.
    Duan X; Shi J; Wu J; Mou Y; Cui H; Wang G
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Jun; 457(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 19429159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of attentional processes in ADHD and normal children.
    Gupta R; Kar BR
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():259-76. PubMed ID: 19733762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ability to activate and inhibit speeded responses: separate developmental trends.
    Band GP; van der Molen MW; Overtoom CC; Verbaten MN
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2000 Apr; 75(4):263-90. PubMed ID: 10698613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The development of selective inhibitory control across the life span.
    Bedard AC; Nichols S; Barbosa JA; Schachar R; Logan GD; Tannock R
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2002; 21(1):93-111. PubMed ID: 12058837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mapping the development of response inhibition in young children using a modified day-night task.
    McAuley T; Christ SE; White DA
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2011; 36(5):539-51. PubMed ID: 21667359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditions under which children experience inhibitory difficulty with a "button-press" go/no-go task.
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 May; 94(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16325846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of the ability to inhibit a prepotent response: influence of working memory and processing speed.
    Urben S; Van der Linden M; Barisnikov K
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2011 Nov; 29(Pt 4):981-98. PubMed ID: 21995748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses.
    van den Wildenberg WP; van der Molen MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Mar; 87(3):201-20. PubMed ID: 14972598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental relations between working memory and inhibitory control.
    Roncadin C; Pascual-Leone J; Rich JB; Dennis M
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2007 Jan; 13(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 17166304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining the development of attention and executive functions in children with a novel paradigm.
    Klimkeit EI; Mattingley JB; Sheppard DM; Farrow M; Bradshaw JL
    Child Neuropsychol; 2004 Sep; 10(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 15590499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response-selection conflict contributes to inhibition of return.
    Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 May; 21(5):991-9. PubMed ID: 18752398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
    Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shifting development in mid-childhood: the influence of between-task interference.
    Cragg L; Nation K
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Sep; 45(5):1465-79. PubMed ID: 19702406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An interfering Go/No-go task does not affect accuracy in a Concealed Information Test.
    Ambach W; Stark R; Peper M; Vaitl D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Apr; 68(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 18180065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response preparation with static versus moving hands.
    Adam JJ; Moresi S
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Dec; 65(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 17540489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.