578 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19046632)
1. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Coebergh JW; van Beek M; Hooijen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 19046632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How reassuring is a normal breast ultrasound in assessment of a screen-detected mammographic abnormality? A review of interval cancers after assessment that included ultrasound evaluation.
Bennett ML; Welman CJ; Celliers LM
Clin Radiol; 2011 Oct; 66(10):928-39. PubMed ID: 21718976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography screening in the Netherlands: delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer after breast cancer screening.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Jansen FH; Fracheboud J; van Beek M; de Koning HJ
Br J Cancer; 2004 Nov; 91(10):1795-9. PubMed ID: 15505630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tumour characteristics of bilateral screen-detected cancers and bilateral interval cancers in women participating at biennial screening mammography.
van Bommel R; Lameijer JRC; Voogd AC; Nederend J; Louwman MWJ; Setz-Pels W; Strobbe LJ; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LE
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():215-221. PubMed ID: 30396659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient and tumor characteristics of bilateral breast cancer at screening mammography in the Netherlands, a population-based study.
Setz-Pels W; Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Louwman MW; Jansen FH; van Beek M; Plaisier ML; Voogd AC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Oct; 129(3):955-61. PubMed ID: 21553118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: effects on a biennial screening programme outcome.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; van Ineveld BM; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ
Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jun; 44(9):1223-8. PubMed ID: 18400488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands.
Klompenhouwer EG; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; de Haan AF; Wauters CA; Broeders MJ; Duijm LE
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 25573788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in surgery for screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a national screening programme.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Roumen RM; Jansen FH; Voogd AC
Br J Surg; 2014 Jul; 101(8):949-58. PubMed ID: 24828281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of bilateral breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in the Netherlands: a population-based study.
Setz-Pels W; Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Voogd AC; Jansen FH; Hooijen MJ; Louwman MW
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 21474705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: a review of 24,211 examinations.
Hunt KA; Rosen EL; Sickles EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 10430120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Re-attendance at biennial screening mammography following a repeated false positive recall.
Klompenhouwer EG; Duijm LE; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Venderink D; Broeders MJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jun; 145(2):429-37. PubMed ID: 24748569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program.
Prummel MV; Done SJ; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ; Holloway CM; Chiarelli AM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep; 147(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 25108740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading--evidence to guide future screening strategies.
Houssami N; Macaskill P; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 50(10):1799-1807. PubMed ID: 24746887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK.
Smith-Bindman R; Ballard-Barbash R; Miglioretti DL; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 15814020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency and characteristics of contralateral breast abnormalities following recall at screening mammography.
Lameijer JRC; Coolen AM; Voogd AC; Strobbe LJ; Louwman MWJ; Venderink D; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Duijm LEM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Oct; 28(10):4205-4214. PubMed ID: 29666991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
