These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19047558)
1. Assessing citations with the Eigenfactor metrics. Bergstrom CT; West JD Neurology; 2008 Dec; 71(23):1850-1. PubMed ID: 19047558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Citation and readership metrics: how does Neurology measure up? Noseworthy JH; Gross RA Neurology; 2008 Dec; 71(23):1846-7. PubMed ID: 19047556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators. Pendlebury DA Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19219526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A longer paper gathers more citations. Ball P Nature; 2008 Sep; 455(7211):274-5. PubMed ID: 18800099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Citations, impact factors and shady publication practices: how should the lasting clinical and social value of research really be measured? O'Connor SJ Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2010 Mar; 19(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 20486987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A rose by any other name is still a rose: assessing journal quality. Broome ME Nurs Outlook; 2007; 55(4):163-4. PubMed ID: 17678678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A new system to change "the system": an answer to calls to supplement citation metrics with other measures of scientific contribution. Moore A Bioessays; 2011 Nov; 33(11):785. PubMed ID: 22006820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Moed HF Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 19219533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Copied citations give impact factors a boost. Clarke T Nature; 2003 May; 423(6938):373. PubMed ID: 12761513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. On the agreement between bibliometrics and peer review: Evidence from the Italian research assessment exercises. Baccini A; Barabesi L; De Nicolao G PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242520. PubMed ID: 33206715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of the journal impact factor: choosing the optimal source of peer-reviewed plastic surgery information. Rohrich RJ; Sullivan D Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Jun; 117(7):2495-8. PubMed ID: 16772962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The association between four citation metrics and peer rankings of research influence of Australian researchers in six fields of public health. Derrick GE; Haynes A; Chapman S; Hall WD PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18521. PubMed ID: 21494691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 'Bibliometrics' is flawed. Williamson T Nurs Times; 2008 Apr 8-14; 104(14):12. PubMed ID: 18497232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Observacional study: evaluation of the diagnostic research methodology in Spain after STARD publication]. Gómez Sáez N; Hernández-Aguado I; Lumbreras B Med Clin (Barc); 2009 Sep; 133(8):302-10. PubMed ID: 19237177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Are higher quality papers cited more often? Patterson MS Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(17):i. PubMed ID: 19798808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Audit of submissions: July 2007 to June 2008. Black N; Mays N; Rivett-Carnac C J Health Serv Res Policy; 2009 Jan; 14(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 19103910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]