147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19048267)
1. False negative result for amphetamines on the Triage Drug of Abuse panel? The cause of the unusual phenomenon with experimental analyses.
Hikiji W; Kudo K; Sato S; Usumoto Y; Tsuji A; Ikeda N
Int J Legal Med; 2009 May; 123(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 19048267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Triage screening for drugs of abuse in postmortem blood and urine samples.
Moriya F; Hashimoto Y
Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1997 Jun; 51(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 9301227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Usefulness of AccuSign in emergency room].
Nakamura Y; Nakano M; Takahashi E; Suzuki H; Hasuike T; Akuzawa H; Yuasa H
Chudoku Kenkyu; 2012 Sep; 25(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 23057405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of famprofazone ingestion.
Musshoff F; Kraemer T
Int J Legal Med; 1998; 111(6):305-8. PubMed ID: 9826089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Identification of Methamphetamine Abuse and Selegiline Use： Chiral Analysis of Methamphetamine and Amphetamine in Urine].
Xiang P; Bu J; Qiao Z; Zhuo XY; Wu HJ; Shen M
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 33(6):599-603. PubMed ID: 29441766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduced interference by phenothiazines in amphetamine drug of abuse immunoassays.
Melanson SE; Lee-Lewandrowski E; Griggs DA; Long WH; Flood JG
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Dec; 130(12):1834-8. PubMed ID: 17149959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of the Triage panel for drugs of abuse to forensic blood samples.
Moriya F; Hashimoto Y
Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1996 Apr; 50(2):50-6. PubMed ID: 8691649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The urinary screening and identification of amphetamines in clinical toxicology laboratory--VGH].
Lin WL; Deng JF; Chou LJ; Hung DZ; Tsai WJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1991 Oct; 48(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 1659927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amphetamine and methamphetamine poisonings attended in hospital emergency departments: clinical features and the usefulness of laboratory confirmation.
Roset Ferrer C; Gomila Muñiz I; Elorza Guerrero MÁ; Puiguriguer Ferrando J; Leciñena Estean MÁ; Tuero León G; Sahuquillo Frías L; Ripoll Vera T; Socias Crespi L; Sanchís Cortés P; Barceló Martín B
Emergencias; 2020 Feb; 32(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 31909909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiation of amphetamine/methamphetamine and other cross-immunoreactive sympathomimetic amines in urine samples by serial dilution testing.
Woodworth A; Saunders AN; Koenig JW; Moyer TP; Turk J; Dietzen DJ
Clin Chem; 2006 Apr; 52(4):743-6. PubMed ID: 16455869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The false positive reaction of the Triage panel drug-of-abuse by herbal drugs ma-huang (Ephedra sinica (Ephedraceae))].
Nishiguchi M; Kinoshita H; Higasa K; Taniguchi T; Ouchi H; Minami T; Marukawa S; Yoshinaga K; Yamauchi J; Aoki S; Hishida S
Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 2001 Nov; 55(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 11905042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. False positive amphetamines and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine immunoassays in the presence of metoprolol-two cases reported in clinical toxicology.
Leclercq M; Soichot M; Delhotal-Landes B; Bourgogne E; Gourlain H; Mégarbane B; Labat L
J Anal Toxicol; 2020 Mar; 44(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 31384953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lack of Detection of New Amphetamine-Like Drugs Using Conventional Urinary Immunoassays.
Begeman A; Franssen EJF
Ther Drug Monit; 2018 Feb; 40(1):135-139. PubMed ID: 29194289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low concentrations of methamphetamine detectable in urine in the presence of high concentrations of amphetamine.
Jemionek JF; Addison J; Past MR
J Anal Toxicol; 2009 Apr; 33(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 19371467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the on-site immunoassay drug-screening device Triage-TOX in routine forensic autopsy.
Tominaga M; Michiue T; Maeda H
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Nov; 17(6):499-502. PubMed ID: 26593997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and amphetamine-type stimulants in oral fluid using the Rapid Stat point-of-collection drug-testing device.
Röhrich J; Zörntlein S; Becker J; Urban R
J Anal Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 20406540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Urine levels of drugs for which Triage DOA screening was positive.
Moriya F
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2009 Apr; 11 Suppl 1():S434-6. PubMed ID: 19261513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immunoassay cross-reactivity of phenylephrine and methamphetamine.
Curtin LB; Cawley MJ
Pharmacotherapy; 2012 May; 32(5):e98-102. PubMed ID: 22499397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hallucinations in a child: a case demonstrating the pitfalls of urine dipstick drug testing.
Boroda A; Akhter R
J Forensic Leg Med; 2008 Apr; 15(3):198-9. PubMed ID: 18313019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative and isomeric determination of amphetamine and methamphetamine from urine using a nonprotic elution solvent and R(-)-alpha-methoxy-alpha-trifluoromethylphenylacetic acid chloride derivatization.
Holler JM; Vorce SP; Bosy TZ; Jacobs A
J Anal Toxicol; 2005 Oct; 29(7):652-7. PubMed ID: 16419395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
