194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19048344)
1. Sensitivity to interaural time differences with combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.
Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Mar; 10(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 19048344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Localization and interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds for cochlear implant recipients with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear.
Gifford RH; Grantham DW; Sheffield SW; Davis TJ; Dwyer R; Dorman MF
Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():28-37. PubMed ID: 24607490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Zirn S; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rate dependent neural responses of interaural-time-difference cues in fine-structure and envelope.
Hu H; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B; Vickers D
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17104. PubMed ID: 38680894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):335-49. PubMed ID: 25618064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Gifford RH; Stecker GC
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.
Vollmer M
J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(31):6949-6966. PubMed ID: 29959238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
Körtje M; Baumann U; Stöver T; Weissgerber T
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0241015. PubMed ID: 33075114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity to interaural level difference and loudness growth with bilateral bimodal stimulation.
Francart T; Brokx J; Wouters J
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(5):309-19. PubMed ID: 18391567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extent of lateralization at large interaural time differences in simulated electric hearing and bilateral cochlear implant users.
Baumgärtel RM; Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2338. PubMed ID: 28464641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
Klingel M; Laback B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):119-136. PubMed ID: 34812980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users.
Aronoff JM; Yoon YS; Freed DJ; Vermiglio AJ; Pal I; Soli SD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):EL87-92. PubMed ID: 20329812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modulation enhancement in the electrical signal improves perception of interaural time differences with bimodal stimulation.
Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Aug; 15(4):633-47. PubMed ID: 24890714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of interaural differences in envelope shape on the perceived location of sounds (L).
Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):611-4. PubMed ID: 22894182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
