These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19048454)

  • 1. Display size effects in visual search: analyses of reaction time distributions as mixtures.
    Reynolds A; Miller J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):988-1009. PubMed ID: 19048454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.
    Sung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1372-88. PubMed ID: 19045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Episodic retrieval and feature facilitation in intertrial priming of visual search.
    Ásgeirsson ÁG; Kristjánsson Á
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1350-60. PubMed ID: 21491164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of display size on visual attention.
    Chen IP; Liao CN; Yeh SH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Jun; 112(3):959-74. PubMed ID: 21853782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intertrial repetition facilitates selection in time: common mechanisms underlie spatial and temporal search.
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):243-51. PubMed ID: 20424053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: a direct behavioral demonstration.
    Bricolo E; Gianesini T; Fanini A; Bundesen C; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):980-93. PubMed ID: 12419123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional priming and visual search in pigeons.
    Blough PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Oct; 15(4):358-65. PubMed ID: 2794871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Odd-item search in pigeons: display size and transfer effects.
    Blough DS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Jan; 15(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 2926332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibitory tagging in an interrupted visual search.
    Thomas LE; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1241-50. PubMed ID: 19633340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions.
    Proulx MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17311478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention.
    Goolkasian P
    Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the evidence for response time mixture distributions.
    Dixon P
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):706-24. PubMed ID: 22903629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prioritization of looming and receding objects: equal slopes, different intercepts.
    Skarratt PA; Cole GG; Gellatly AR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):964-70. PubMed ID: 19429972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search.
    Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 19304616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contextual cueing in multiconjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies.
    Geyer T; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):515-32. PubMed ID: 20515186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new look at novelty effects: guiding search away from old distractors.
    Yang H; Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):554-64. PubMed ID: 19304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of template complexity on visual search and dual-task performance.
    Bourke PA; Duncan J
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15733201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do new objects capture attention?
    Franconeri SL; Hollingworth A; Simons DJ
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 15828974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.