BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19048626)

  • 1. At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; van Ballegooijen M; Zauber AG; Boer R; Wilschut J; Habbema JD
    Int J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 124(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 19048626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
    Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Kim DH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 May; 192(5):1332-40. PubMed ID: 19380558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?
    Kriza C; Emmert M; Wahlster P; Niederländer C; Kolominsky-Rabas P
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e629-36. PubMed ID: 23938237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.
    Pyenson B; Pickhardt PJ; Sawhney TG; Berrios M
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):2966-76. PubMed ID: 26350285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Greuter MJ; Berkhof J; Fijneman RJ; Demirel E; Lew JB; Meijer GA; Stoker J; Coupé VM
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150910. PubMed ID: 27194458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Kim DH; Zullo A; Iafrate F; Di Giulio L; Morini S
    Arch Intern Med; 2008 Apr; 168(7):696-705. PubMed ID: 18413551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy or barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer in older symptomatic patients: two multicentre randomised trials with economic evaluation (the SIGGAR trials).
    Halligan S; Dadswell E; Wooldrage K; Wardle J; von Wagner C; Lilford R; Yao GL; Zhu S; Atkin W
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jul; 19(54):1-134. PubMed ID: 26198205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of surveillance with CT colonography after resection of colorectal cancer.
    Kuntz KM; Popp J; Beck JR; Zauber AG; Weinberg DS
    BMJ Open Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 32933928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.
    Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Morini S
    Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(11):2213-21. PubMed ID: 17455218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Colorectal Cancer: Cost-effectiveness of Colonoscopy versus CT Colonography Screening with Participation Rates and Costs.
    van der Meulen MP; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Goede SL; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J; van Ballegooijen M
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):901-911. PubMed ID: 29485322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
    Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography colonography in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.
    Hanly P; Skally M; Fenlon H; Sharp L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Oct; 28(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 23006522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.
    Regge D; Iussich G; Senore C; Correale L; Hassan C; Bert A; Montemezzi S; Segnan N
    Trials; 2014 Mar; 15():97. PubMed ID: 24678896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
    Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia.
    Vijan S; Hwang I; Inadomi J; Wong RK; Choi JR; Napierkowski J; Koff JM; Pickhardt PJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):380-90. PubMed ID: 17156139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.
    Regge D; Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
    Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):488-97. PubMed ID: 19188317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical management of small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1509-16. PubMed ID: 18941093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study).
    Sali L; Grazzini G; Carozzi F; Castiglione G; Falchini M; Mallardi B; Mantellini P; Ventura L; Regge D; Zappa M; Mascalchi M; Milani S
    Trials; 2013 Mar; 14():74. PubMed ID: 23497601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.
    Vanness DJ; Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Gareen IF; Herman BA; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M; Feuer EJ; Chen MH; Johnson CD
    Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 21813740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.