246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19049018)
1. Non-beneficial pediatric research and the best interests standard: a legal and ethical reconciliation.
Litton P
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2008; 8(2):359-420. PubMed ID: 19049018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pediatric research: what is broken and what needs to be fixed?
Lantos JD
J Pediatr; 2004 Feb; 144(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 14760250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Moral responsiveness in pediatric research ethics.
Moeller CJ
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):W1-W3. PubMed ID: 14744302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Making all the children above average: ethical and regulatory concerns for pediatricians in pediatric enhancement research.
Berg JW; Mehlman MJ; Rubin DB; Kodish E
Clin Pediatr (Phila); 2009 Jun; 48(5):472-80. PubMed ID: 19164131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nontherapeutic research with children: the virtues and vices of legal uncertainty.
Smolin DM
Cumberland Law Rev; 2002-2003; 33(3):621-45. PubMed ID: 15378825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pediatric research and the federal minimal risk standard.
Ross LF; Nelson RM
JAMA; 2006 Feb; 295(7):759; author reply 759-60. PubMed ID: 16478898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Values, obligations, and virtues: approaches to bio-medical ethics.
Ogletree TW
J Relig Ethics; 1976; 4(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 11663657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Going beyond parents and institutional review boards in protecting children involved in nontherapeutic research.
Rubinstein E
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2003; 33(2):251-94. PubMed ID: 15164740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Group benefit and protection of pediatric research subjects: Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger and the Lead Abatement Study.
Kopelman LM
Account Res; 2002; 9(3-4):177-92. PubMed ID: 12816126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why we need legal standards for pediatric research.
Wendler D; Forster H
J Pediatr; 2004 Feb; 144(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 14760251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpretation of the subjects' condition requirement: a legal perspective.
Shah S; Wendler D
J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 20579233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical studies and the average American kid.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 2005 Aug; ():A5. PubMed ID: 16138447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Parental consent for children's participation in biomedical research: the ethical, regulatory, and judicial framework of Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
Thiel KS
J Health Care Law Policy; 2002; 6(1):169-93. PubMed ID: 15017956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioterrorism, biodefense, and biotechnology in the military: a comparative analysis of legal and ethical issues in the research, development, and use of biotechnological products on American and British soldiers.
Melson AR
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2004; 14(2):E1-E44. PubMed ID: 16521317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assent and dissent in 407 research with children.
Murphy TF
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):18-9. PubMed ID: 14744313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Harmonizing regulations for biomedical research: a critical analysis of the US and Venezuelan systems.
Di Tillio-Gonzalez D; Fischbach RL
Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 17488491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critics claim even babies could be exposed to pesticides in research.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Aug; 20(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 16320460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An ethicist's perspective on human radiation tests.
Graber GC
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):115-21. PubMed ID: 12962098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical testing: issues and ethics.
Mossman KL
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):90-101. PubMed ID: 12962094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "What is legal is not necessarily ethical": the limits of law and drug-testing programs.
Luna E
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 15035947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
