352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19049530)
1. Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.
Reich S; Kappe K; Teschner H; Schmitt J
Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 19049530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems.
Reich S; Wichmann M; Nkenke E; Proeschel P
Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Apr; 113(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 15819826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems.
Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Li J; Borchers L; Stiesch M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19583762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Dittmer MP; Borchers L; Stiesch M
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 37(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 20059649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures.
Wettstein F; Sailer I; Roos M; Hämmerle CH
Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Jun; 116(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 18471247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system.
Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Spiekermann H; Anusavice KJ
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 11504436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up.
Sailer I; Gottnerb J; Kanelb S; Hammerle CH
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 19918588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A four-year prospective clinical evaluation of zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses.
Pelaez J; Cogolludo PG; Serrano B; Serrano JF; Suarez MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 22930766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 19639075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study.
Raigrodski AJ; Chiche GJ; Potiket N; Hochstedler JL; Mohamed SE; Billiot S; Mercante DE
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 17052467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study.
Bayramoğlu E; Özkan YK; Yildiz C
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25858218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The reproducibility and accuracy of internal fit of Cerec 3D CAD/CAM all ceramic crowns.
D'Arcy BL; Omer OE; Byrne DA; Quinn F
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Jun; 17(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19645308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal fit of Zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(5):398-9. PubMed ID: 18950059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic posterior three-unit FDPs made of In-Ceram Zirconia.
Eschbach S; Wolfart S; Bohlsen F; Kern M
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):490-2. PubMed ID: 20095200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
