These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19050738)

  • 1. Fungal Fragments in Moldy Houses: A Field Study in Homes in New Orleans and Southern Ohio.
    Reponen T; Seo SC; Grimsley F; Lee T; Crawford C; Grinshpun SA
    Atmos Environ (1994); 2007 Dec; 41(37):8140-8149. PubMed ID: 19050738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Size-fractionated (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan concentrations aerosolized from different moldy building materials.
    Seo SC; Reponen T; Levin L; Grinshpun SA
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Jan; 407(2):806-14. PubMed ID: 19012949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The level of submicron fungal fragments in homes with asthmatic children.
    Seo S; Choung JT; Chen BT; Lindsley WG; Kim KY
    Environ Res; 2014 May; 131():71-6. PubMed ID: 24657943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the aerosolization potential for fungal spores in moldy homes.
    Sivasubramani SK; Niemeier RT; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 15500633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Size-selective assessment of agricultural workers' personal exposure to airborne fungi and fungal fragments.
    Lee SA; Liao CH
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jan; 466-467():725-32. PubMed ID: 23973538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Airborne fungal cell fragments in homes in relation to total fungal biomass.
    Adhikari A; Reponen T; Rylander R
    Indoor Air; 2013 Apr; 23(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22804753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Submicron fungal fragments as another indoor biocontaminant in elementary schools.
    Seo S; Ji YG; Yoo Y; Kwon MH; Choung JT
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Jun; 17(6):1164-72. PubMed ID: 25984716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of airborne ergosterol, glucan and Air-O-Cell data in relation to physical assessments of mold damage and some other parameters.
    Foto M; Vrijmoed LL; Miller JD; Ruest K; Lawton M; Dales RE
    Indoor Air; 2005 Aug; 15(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 15982272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fungal spore source strength tester: laboratory evaluation of a new concept.
    Sivasubramani SK; Niemeier RT; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Aug; 329(1-3):75-86. PubMed ID: 15262159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Release and characteristics of fungal fragments in various conditions.
    Mensah-Attipoe J; Saari S; Veijalainen AM; Pasanen P; Keskinen J; Leskinen JTT; Reponen T
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Mar; 547():234-243. PubMed ID: 26789361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fungal aerosol composition in moldy basements.
    Afanou AK; Straumfors A; Eduard W
    Indoor Air; 2019 Sep; 29(5):780-790. PubMed ID: 31106451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visible fungi growth and dampness assessed using a questionnaire versus airborne fungi, (1→3)-β-D-glucan and fungal spore concentrations in flats.
    Sowiak M; Jeżak K; Kozajda A; Sobala W; Szadkowska-Stańczyk I
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2015; 28(1):130-46. PubMed ID: 26159954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resident cleanup activities, characteristics of flood-damaged homes and airborne microbial concentrations in New Orleans, Louisiana, October 2005.
    Riggs MA; Rao CY; Brown CM; Van Sickle D; Cummings KJ; Dunn KH; Deddens JA; Ferdinands J; Callahan D; Moolenaar RL; Pinkerton LE
    Environ Res; 2008 Mar; 106(3):401-9. PubMed ID: 18199434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aerosolization of fungi, (1-->3)-beta-D glucan, and endotoxin from flood-affected materials collected in New Orleans homes.
    Adhikari A; Jung J; Reponen T; Lewis JS; DeGrasse EC; Grimsley LF; Chew GL; Grinshpun SA
    Environ Res; 2009 Apr; 109(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 19201399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Typical levels of airborne fungal spores in houses without obvious moisture problems during a rainy season in Florida, USA.
    Codina R; Fox RW; Lockey RF; DeMarco P; Bagg A
    J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 2008; 18(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 18564625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Profile and Morphology of Fungal Aerosols Characterized by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM).
    Afanou KA; Straumfors A; Skogstad A; Skaar I; Hjeljord L; Skare Ø; Green BJ; Tronsmo A; Eduard W
    Aerosol Sci Technol; 2015; 49(6):423-435. PubMed ID: 26855468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indirect Immunodetection of Fungal Fragments by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy.
    Afanou KA; Straumfors A; Skogstad A; Nayak AP; Skaar I; Hjeljord L; Tronsmo A; Eduard W; Green BJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2015 Sep; 81(17):5794-803. PubMed ID: 26092450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of airborne molds, endotoxins, and glucans in homes in New Orleans after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
    Rao CY; Riggs MA; Chew GL; Muilenberg ML; Thorne PS; Van Sickle D; Dunn KH; Brown C
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 73(5):1630-4. PubMed ID: 17209066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Airborne mold and endotoxin concentrations in New Orleans, Louisiana, after flooding, October through November 2005.
    Solomon GM; Hjelmroos-Koski M; Rotkin-Ellman M; Hammond SK
    Environ Health Perspect; 2006 Sep; 114(9):1381-6. PubMed ID: 16966092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of fungal contamination in moldy homes: comparison of different methods.
    Niemeier RT; Sivasubramani SK; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 May; 3(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 16595378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.