75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19052929)
1. 1-year results using the Opus speech processor with the fine structure speech coding strategy.
Riss D; Arnoldner C; Reiss S; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 129(9):988-91. PubMed ID: 19052929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term improvement of speech perception with the fine structure processing coding strategy in cochlear implants.
Kleine Punte A; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2014; 76(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 24685836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvements in speech perception after the upgrade from the TEMPO+ to the OPUS 2 audio processor.
Seebens Y; Diller G
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 22094825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.
Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 15148187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fine Structure Processing improves speech perception as well as objective and subjective benefits in pediatric MED-EL COMBI 40+ users.
Lorens A; Zgoda M; Obrycka A; Skarżynski H
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 74(12):1372-8. PubMed ID: 20933288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Envelope versus fine structure speech coding strategy: a crossover study.
Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Selberherr A; Kaider A; Blineder M; Starlinger V; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1094-101. PubMed ID: 21817932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Brunner M; Durisin M; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 127(12):1298-303. PubMed ID: 17851892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new fine structure speech coding strategy: speech perception at a reduced number of channels.
Riss D; Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Hamzavi JS
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Sep; 29(6):784-8. PubMed ID: 18667945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120.
Brendel M; Buechner A; Krueger B; Frohne-Buechner C; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18223447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Better speech recognition in noise with the fine structure processing coding strategy.
Vermeire K; Punte AK; Van de Heyning P
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2010; 72(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 20847579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FS4, FS4-p, and FSP: a 4-month crossover study of 3 fine structure sound-coding strategies.
Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Blineder M; Honeder C; Ehrenreich I; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e272-81. PubMed ID: 25127325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
Kasturi K; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of fine structure and extended low frequencies in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.
Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Katzinger M; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 75(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 21324531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech recognition outcomes in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with fine structure processing.
Qi B; Liu Z; Gu X; Liu B
Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 137(3):286-292. PubMed ID: 27701966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT
Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.
Skinner MW; Clark GM; Whitford LA; Seligman PM; Staller SJ; Shipp DB; Shallop JK; Everingham C; Menapace CM; Arndt PL
Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15 Suppl 2():15-27. PubMed ID: 8572106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
