These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19052929)

  • 21. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recent results with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant and TEMPO+ behind-the-ear processor.
    Anderson I; Weichbold V; D'Haese P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2002 Apr; 81(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 11987740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Temporal fine structure in cochlear implants: preliminary speech perception results in Cantonese-speaking implant users.
    Schatzer R; Krenmayr A; Au DK; Kals M; Zierhofer C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Sep; 130(9):1031-9. PubMed ID: 20141488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation.
    van der Beek FB; Soede W; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 17204902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of FM-receiver gain on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Wolfe J; Lawless T; Stout B
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 19363720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.
    Wong LL; Vandali AE; Ciocca V; Luk B; Ip VW; Murray B; Yu HC; Chung I
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):337-47. PubMed ID: 18569106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech perception performance for 100 post-lingually deaf adults fitted with Neurelec cochlear implants: Comparison between Digisonic® Convex and Digisonic® SP devices after a 1-year follow-up.
    Lazard DS; Bordure P; Lina-Granade G; Magnan J; Meller R; Meyer B; Radafy E; Roux PE; Gnansia D; Péan V; Truy E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Nov; 130(11):1267-73. PubMed ID: 20446821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Results from a psychoacoustic model-based strategy for the nucleus-24 and freedom cochlear implants.
    Büchner A; Nogueira W; Edler B; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 18223445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC; Li N; Kasturi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spatial speech perception benefits in young children with normal hearing and cochlear implants.
    Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):702-13. PubMed ID: 20548238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the body-worn CIS-PRO + and the behind-the-ear-worn TEMPO + cochlear implant systems in Finnish-speaking adult CI users: any differences in results with experienced listeners?
    Välimaa TT; Löppönen HJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 128(9):984-91. PubMed ID: 19086195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Audiologic results with the MSP/MPEAK and WSP/F0F1F2 processors and coding strategies for the nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 7996630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Results of speech processor upgrade in a population of Veterans Affairs cochlear implant recipients.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Roland JT; Bromberg B; Cambron N; Gibbs L; Parkinson W; Snead C
    Am J Otol; 1997 Jul; 18(4):462-5. PubMed ID: 9233486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the TEMPO+ ear-level speech processor and the cis pro+ body-worn processor in adult MED-EL cochlear implant users.
    Helms J; Müller J; Schön F; Winkler F; Moser L; Shehata-Dieler W; Kastenbauer E; Baumann U; Rasp G; Schorn K; Ebetaer B; Baumgartner W; Hamzavi S; Gstöttner W; Westhofen M; Döring W; Dujardin H; Albegger K; Mair A; Zenner H; Haferkamp C; Schmitz-Salue C; Arold R; Sesterhenn G; Jahnke V; Wagner H; Gräbel S; Bockmühl U; Häusler R; Vischer M; Kompis M; Hildmann H; Radü H; Stark T; Engel A; Hildmann A; Streitberger C; Hüttenbrink K; Müller-Aschoff E; Hofmann G; Seeling K; Hloucal U; von Ilberg C; Kiefer J; Pfennigdorff T; Gall V; Breitfuss A; Stelzig Y; Begall K; Hey M; Vorwerk W; Thumfart W; Gunkel A; Zorowka P; Stephan K; Gammert C; Mathis A; DeMin N; Freigang B; Ziese M; Stützel A; von Specht H; Arnold W; Brockmeier S; Ebenhoch H; Steinhoff A; Zierhofer C; Zwicknagl M; Stöbich B
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2001; 63(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11174060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Current steering and results from novel speech coding strategies.
    Buechner A; Brendel M; Krüeger B; Frohne-Büchner C; Nogueira W; Edler B; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 18223448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.