These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19053940)

  • 1. Solaria compliance with the Australia/New Zealand Standard in Adelaide.
    Jones S; Rayner J; Beckmann K
    Health Promot J Austr; 2008 Dec; 19(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 19053940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Access to commercial indoor tanning facilities by adults with highly sensitive skin and by under-age youth: compliance tests at solarium centres in Melbourne, Australia.
    Dobbinson S; Wakefield M; Sambell N
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2006 Oct; 15(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 16912571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What impact would effective solarium regulation have in Australia?
    Gordon LG; Hirst NG; Gies PH; Green AC
    Med J Aust; 2008 Oct; 189(7):375-8. PubMed ID: 18837680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compliance with age and skin type restrictions following the introduction of indoor tanning legislation in Melbourne, Australia.
    Makin JK; Hearne K; Dobbinson SJ
    Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2011 Dec; 27(6):286-93. PubMed ID: 22092731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Why indoor tanning must be taxed? A proposal from La Sécurité Solaire, WHO collaborating centre].
    Boniol M; Césarini P; Chignol MC; Césarini JP; Doré JF
    Presse Med; 2010 Dec; 39(12):1236-7. PubMed ID: 20970955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Solaria compliance in an unregulated environment: the Australian experience.
    Paul CL; Stacey F; Girgis A; Brozek I; Baird H; Hughes J
    Eur J Cancer; 2005 May; 41(8):1178-84. PubMed ID: 15911242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compliance by California tanning facilities with the nation's first statewide ban on use before the age of 18 years.
    Grewal SK; Haas AF; Pletcher MJ; Resneck JS
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Dec; 69(6):883-889.e4. PubMed ID: 24120564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mixed messages and a missed opportunity: Australian news media coverage of Clare Oliver's campaign against solaria.
    MacKenzie R; Imison M; Chapman S; Holding S
    Med J Aust; 2008 Oct; 189(7):371-4. PubMed ID: 18837679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The US Food and Drug Administration's Proposed Rule to Increase Regulation of Indoor Tanning Devices.
    Coups EJ; Geller AC; Pagoto SL
    JAMA Dermatol; 2016 May; 152(5):509-10. PubMed ID: 26981925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptions of the solarium ban in Australia: 'Fake it, don't bake it'.
    Prichard I; Dobbinson S; Wilson C; Hutchinson AD; Rayner J; Makin J
    Health Promot J Austr; 2015 Aug; 26(2):154-158. PubMed ID: 26169388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of solarium industry efforts to improve compliance with recommended practices: a clear case for formal regulation.
    Paul CL; Girgis A; Anniwell L; Paras L; Lecathelinais C
    Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2009 Aug; 25(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 19614896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Legislators combat melanoma, restrict teen tanning.
    Whitworth A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Nov; 98(22):1594-6. PubMed ID: 17105979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Texas ultraviolet tanning youth access law.
    Dellavalle R
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 May; 52(5):926; author reply 926-7. PubMed ID: 15858501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sunbeds and young people: an easy target for legislation?
    Diffey B
    Br J Dermatol; 2013 Aug; 169(2):236-7. PubMed ID: 23941246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commercial solariums banned in Australia.
    Howe M
    Lancet Oncol; 2015 Feb; 16(2):e58. PubMed ID: 25601345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compliance with federal and state legislation by indoor tanning facilities in San Diego.
    Culley CA; Mayer JA; Eckhardt L; Busic AJ; Eichenfield LF; Sallis JF; Quintana PJ; Woodruff SI
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Jan; 44(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11148477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tanning Salon Compliance Rates in States With Legislation to Protect Youth Access to UV Tanning.
    Williams MS; Buhalog B; Blumenthal L; Stratman EJ
    JAMA Dermatol; 2018 Jan; 154(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 29071349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sunbed use among subjects at high risk of melanoma: an Italian survey after the ban.
    Stanganelli I; Gandini S; Magi S; Mazzoni L; Medri M; Agnoletti V; Lombi L; Falcini F
    Br J Dermatol; 2013 Aug; 169(2):351-7. PubMed ID: 23601037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Growing Public Health Challenges of Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation From Use of Indoor Tanning Devices in the United States.
    Bowman DM; Lewis RC; Lee MS; Yao CJ
    New Solut; 2015 Aug; 25(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 25995373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Solarium use and melanoma risk].
    Weismann K; Lorentzen H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Oct; 166(41):3589-90. PubMed ID: 15515461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.