These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19054051)

  • 1. Assortative mate choice and dominance modification: alternative ways of removing heterozygote disadvantage.
    Durinx M; Van Dooren TJ
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):334-52. PubMed ID: 19054051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protected polymorphism and evolutionary stability in pleiotropic models with trait-specific dominance.
    Van Dooren TJ
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1991-2003. PubMed ID: 17133856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
    Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolutionary ecology of dominance-recessivity.
    Van Dooren TJ
    J Theor Biol; 1999 Jun; 198(4):519-32. PubMed ID: 10373352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
    Rowell JT; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolution of dominance under frequency-dependent intraspecific competition in an assortatively mating population.
    Peischl S; Schneider KA
    Evolution; 2010 Feb; 64(2):561-82. PubMed ID: 19780814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of dominance under frequency-dependent intraspecific competition.
    Peischl S; Bürger R
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Mar; 251(2):210-26. PubMed ID: 18177673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits.
    Doebeli M
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Nov; 18(6):1587-600. PubMed ID: 16313470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assortative mating by fitness and sexually antagonistic genetic variation.
    Arnqvist G
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2111-6. PubMed ID: 21729064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relative role of male vs. female mate choice in maintaining assortative pairing among discrete colour morphs.
    Pryke SR; Griffith SC
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jul; 20(4):1512-21. PubMed ID: 17584244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The evolution of genomic imprinting: two modifier-locus models.
    Spencer HG; Williams MJ
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Feb; 51(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 9149816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assortative mating through a mechanism of sexual selection.
    Castro L; Toro MA
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Dec; 243(3):386-92. PubMed ID: 16928384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
    Servedio MR; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assortative mating in poison-dart frogs based on an ecologically important trait.
    Reynolds RG; Fitzpatrick BM
    Evolution; 2007 Sep; 61(9):2253-9. PubMed ID: 17767594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolution of genetic architecture under frequency-dependent disruptive selection.
    Kopp M; Hermisson J
    Evolution; 2006 Aug; 60(8):1537-50. PubMed ID: 17017055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females.
    Härdling R; Gosden T; Aguilée R
    Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 18588428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Male dominance, female mate choice, and intersexual conflict in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus).
    Casalini M; Agbali M; Reichard M; Konecná M; Bryjová A; Smith C
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):366-76. PubMed ID: 19154367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.