These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

742 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19054302)

  • 41. Immediate dies for in-office indirect resin restorations.
    Beggs RJ
    Dent Today; 2000 Sep; 19(9):144-9. PubMed ID: 12524736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Determination of the accuracy of three die systems.
    Bloem TJ; Czerniawski B; Luke J; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):758-62. PubMed ID: 2072316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dimensional change in complete dentures fabricated by injection molding and microwave processing.
    Keenan PL; Radford DR; Clark RK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 12589284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Resin pattern material with low polymerization shrinkage.
    Takahashi J; Kitahara K; Teraoka F; Kubo F
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 10635201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Accuracy of the newly formulated vinyl siloxanether elastomeric impression material.
    Stober T; Johnson GH; Schmitter M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):228-39. PubMed ID: 20362766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
    Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison of the accuracy of patterns processed from an inlay casting wax, an auto-polymerized resin and a light-cured resin pattern material.
    Rajagopal P; Chitre V; Aras MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 22945702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of impression accuracy for implant at various angulations.
    Assunção WG; Britto RC; Ricardo Barão VA; Delben JA; dos Santos PH
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 20386220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The dimensional accuracy of 12 impression material and die stone combinations.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD; Sutow EJ; MacSween R
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 1781880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
    Murata H; Hong G; Li YA; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dimensional accuracy of pickup implant impression: an in vitro comparison of novel modular versus standard custom trays.
    Simeone P; Valentini PP; Pizzoferrato R; Scudieri F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):538-46. PubMed ID: 21691600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Repair strength of hypoallergenic denture base materials.
    Pfeiffer P; An N; Schmage P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):292-301. PubMed ID: 18922258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction.
    Walker MP; Petrie CS; Haj-Ali R; Spencer P; Dumas C; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 16336232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Dimensional changes of one-piece frameworks cast from titanium, base metal, or noble metal alloys and supported on telescopic crowns.
    Gebelein M; Richter G; Range U; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 12616241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques.
    Shah S; Sundaram G; Bartlett D; Sherriff M
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):653-8. PubMed ID: 15476960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.