These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19054715)

  • 1. Objective monitoring of physical activity in children: considerations for instrument selection.
    McClain JJ; Tudor-Locke C
    J Sci Med Sport; 2009 Sep; 12(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 19054715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A hitchhiker's guide to assessing young people's physical activity: Deciding what method to use.
    Dollman J; Okely AD; Hardy L; Timperio A; Salmon J; Hills AP
    J Sci Med Sport; 2009 Sep; 12(5):518-25. PubMed ID: 19038579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A hitchhiker's guide to assessing sedentary behaviour among young people: deciding what method to use.
    Hardy LL; Hills AP; Timperio A; Cliff D; Lubans D; Morgan PJ; Taylor BJ; Brown H
    J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Jan; 16(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 22749939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of pedometers for monitoring physical activity in children and adolescents: measurement considerations.
    Clemes SA; Biddle SJ
    J Phys Act Health; 2013 Feb; 10(2):249-62. PubMed ID: 23407447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children.
    Welk GJ; Corbin CB; Dale D
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2000 Jun; 71(2 Suppl):S59-73. PubMed ID: 10925827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.
    Hersh WR; Wallace JA; Patterson PK; Shapiro SE; Kraemer DF; Eilers GM; Chan BK; Greenlick MR; Helfand M
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 2001 Aug; (24 Suppl):1-32. PubMed ID: 11569328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force.
    Matza LS; Patrick DL; Riley AW; Alexander JJ; Rajmil L; Pleil AM; Bullinger M
    Value Health; 2013 Jun; 16(4):461-79. PubMed ID: 23796280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical use of objective measures of physical activity.
    Trost SG; O'Neil M
    Br J Sports Med; 2014 Feb; 48(3):178-81. PubMed ID: 24311601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health-related aspects of objectively measured daily physical activity in children.
    Dencker M; Andersen LB
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2008 May; 28(3):133-44. PubMed ID: 18241209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using ecologic momentary assessment to measure physical activity during adolescence.
    Dunton GF; Whalen CK; Jamner LD; Henker B; Floro JN
    Am J Prev Med; 2005 Nov; 29(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 16242590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Review of physical activity measurement using accelerometers in older adults: considerations for research design and conduct.
    Murphy SL
    Prev Med; 2009 Feb; 48(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 19111780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic approach to selecting an appropriate measure of self-reported physical activity or sedentary behavior.
    Sternfeld B; Goldman-Rosas L
    J Phys Act Health; 2012 Jan; 9 Suppl 1():S19-28. PubMed ID: 22287444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodological considerations in using accelerometers to assess habitual physical activity in children aged 0-5 years.
    Cliff DP; Reilly JJ; Okely AD
    J Sci Med Sport; 2009 Sep; 12(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 19147404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing physical activity using wearable monitors: measures of physical activity.
    Butte NF; Ekelund U; Westerterp KR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Jan; 44(1 Suppl 1):S5-12. PubMed ID: 22157774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The current state of physical activity assessment tools.
    Ainsworth B; Cahalin L; Buman M; Ross R
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 25446555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unit-specific calibration of Actigraph accelerometers in a mechanical setup - is it worth the effort? The effect on random output variation caused by technical inter-instrument variability in the laboratory and in the field.
    Moeller NC; Korsholm L; Kristensen PL; Andersen LB; Wedderkopp N; Froberg K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Apr; 8():19. PubMed ID: 18405353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring activity levels of young people: the validity of pedometers.
    McNamara E; Hudson Z; Taylor SJ
    Br Med Bull; 2010; 95():121-37. PubMed ID: 20562207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].
    Reine G; Lancon C; Simeoni MC; Duplan S; Auquier P
    Encephale; 2003; 29(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 14567165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative content review of children's participation measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Children and Youth.
    Chien CW; Rodger S; Copley J; Skorka K
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 23851418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of physical activity measures from accelerometry among preschoolers in free-living conditions.
    Toschke JA; von Kries R; Rosenfeld E; Toschke AM
    Clin Nutr; 2007 Aug; 26(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 17512641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.