442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19054813)
1. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Angelieri F; de Almeida RR; Janson G; Castanha Henriques JF; Pinzan A
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 19054813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of the pendulum distalising appliance and cervical headgear on the dentofacial structures.
Toy E; Enacar A
Aust Orthod J; 2011 May; 27(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 21696108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Angelieri F; Almeida RR; Almeida MR; Fuziy A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
Fontes FPH; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del-Castillo A; Patel MP; Freitas MR; Henriques JFC; Janson G
Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):424-435. PubMed ID: 32278665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
Siqueira DF; de Almeira RR; Janson G; Brandão AG; Coelho Filho CM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):447.e21-30. PubMed ID: 17418708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative cephalometric study of Class II malocclusion treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig appliances followed by fixed corrective orthodontics.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Janson G; de Freitas MR
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):58-64. PubMed ID: 24351151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
Brickman CD; Sinha PK; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary molar distalization: Pendulum and Fast-Back, comparison between two approaches for Class II malocclusion.
Caprioglio A; Beretta M; Lanteri C
Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 21515227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected].
Pinzan-Vercelino CR; Janson G; Pinzan A; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; de Freitas KM
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 19395372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
