521 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19054814)
1. Post-treatment occlusal changes in Class II division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance.
Bock N; Ruf S
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):606-13. PubMed ID: 19054814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occlusal stability of adult Class II Division 1 treatment with the Herbst appliance.
Bock NC; von Bremen J; Ruf S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 20691355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The integrated Herbst appliance--treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group.
Hägglund P; Segerdal S; Forsberg CM
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 18216374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. a prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 16644850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Success rate and efficiency of activator treatment.
Casutt C; Pancherz H; Gawora M; Ruf S
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 17878188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 10371429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome.
Hönn M; Schneider C; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 16838095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The incisor-lip relationship in Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions.
Schweitzer M; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 2001 Oct; 71(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 11605869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Orthodontists' views on indications for and timing of orthodontic treatment in Finnish public oral health care.
Pietilä I; Pietilä T; Pirttiniemi P; Varrela J; Alanen P
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 17962314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dentoskeletal effects during Herbst-Multibracket appliance treatment: a comparison of lingual and labial approaches.
Bock NC; Ruf S; Wiechmann D; Jilek T
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 26378084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is Herbst-multibracket appliance treatment more efficient in adolescents than in adults?
von Bremen J; Bock N; Ruf S
Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):173-7. PubMed ID: 19123697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types : A pilot study.
Bock NC; Gnandt E; Ruf S
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 May; 77(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 26935963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
