171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19055640)
1. The prothrombin time-derived international normalized ratio: great for Warfarin, fair for prognosis and bad for liver-bleeding risk.
Caldwell S; Shah N
Liver Int; 2008 Dec; 28(10):1325-7. PubMed ID: 19055640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Review article: the prothrombin time test as a measure of bleeding risk and prognosis in liver disease.
Tripodi A; Caldwell SH; Hoffman M; Trotter JF; Sanyal AJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Jul; 26(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 17593061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safe epidural catheter removal in the patient receiving warfarin: does anybody really know what (prothrombin) time it is?
Horlocker TT; Heit JA; Wedel DJ; Enneking FK; Rowlingson JC
Anesthesiology; 2010 Sep; 113(3):759-61; author reply 761. PubMed ID: 20733402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Coagulation assays.
Bates SM; Weitz JI
Circulation; 2005 Jul; 112(4):e53-60. PubMed ID: 16043649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Management of the dental patient on anticoagulant medication.
Rada RE
Dent Today; 2006 Aug; 25(8):58-63. PubMed ID: 16925162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. External quality assessment for prothrombin time/international normalised ratio using point-of-care devices: split-sample or conventional external quality assessment using control samples?
Kitchen D; Murray E; Kitchen S; Jennings I; Fitzmaurice D; Woods T; Walker I
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(7):673-5; author reply 676-7. PubMed ID: 17963156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On the complexity of hemostasis and the need for harmonization of test practice.
Favaloro EJ; Lippi G
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2018 Sep; 56(10):1568-1574. PubMed ID: 29715179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrepancies in international normalized ratios (INR) in swine and humans.
McGlasson DL; Hickman JR; More LE; Best HA; Jacobs LO; Brickey DA; Doe RH
Clin Lab Sci; 1998; 11(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 10181156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rebuttal to: strong lupus anticoagulant can influence the prothrombin time INR falsifying the follow up of oral anticoagulation.
Bailleul E; Van Vaerenbergh K; Lust A
Thromb Haemost; 2005 Sep; 94(3):687; author reply 688. PubMed ID: 16268495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Prothrombin time].
Shimazu C
Nihon Rinsho; 2004 Dec; 62 Suppl 12():586-9. PubMed ID: 15658396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Analysis of prothrombin time in primary health care].
Trydal T; Bolann B; Brosstad F; Sandberg S; Sandset PM; Stavelin A; Steensland H; Thue G; Ødegaard OR
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Aug; 125(15):2048-9. PubMed ID: 16100552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The international normalized ratio of prothrombin time in the model for end-stage liver disease score: a reliable measure.
Kamath PS; Kim WR
Clin Liver Dis; 2009 Feb; 13(1):63-66. PubMed ID: 19150310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Local international normalised ratio (INR) derivation simplified using the European concerted action on anticoagulation (ECAA) prothrombin time/INR line.
Poller L; Jespersen J
Thromb Res; 2011 Aug; 128(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 21658749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. False incoagulable PT-INR results in oral anticoagulant therapy.
Redaelli R; Corno AR; Somaini MG; Gechtman C; Caimi TM; Baudo F; Morra E
Thromb Res; 2008; 122(1):137-9. PubMed ID: 17996923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How to implement the modified international normalized ratio for cirrhosis (INR(liver)) for model for end-stage liver disease calculation.
Tripodi A
Hepatology; 2008 Apr; 47(4):1423-4; author reply 1424. PubMed ID: 18306415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient-specific errors in agreement between International Normalized Ratios measured by a whole blood coagulometer and by a routine plasma-based method.
Attermann J; Andersen NT; Korsgaard H; Maegaard M; Hasenkam JM
Haematologica; 2004 Apr; 89(4):504-5. PubMed ID: 15075091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Choice of PT-INR instruments in primary health care].
Stavelin A; Omenås B; Bolann B; Christensen NG; Sandberg S
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Nov; 128(22):2620. PubMed ID: 19023367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Standardization of the INR: how good is your laboratory's INR and can it be improved?
Favaloro EJ; Adcock DM
Semin Thromb Hemost; 2008 Oct; 34(7):593-603. PubMed ID: 19085760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extrapolation method: as effective as the conventional methods for INR determination.
Gupta M; Mohanty S; Saxena R
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 47(2):306. PubMed ID: 16295509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Can asymptomatic patients with a supratherapeutic international normalized ratio be safely treated as outpatients?
Levine M; Ruha AM; Goldstein JN
Ann Emerg Med; 2012 Apr; 59(4):318-20. PubMed ID: 21867663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
