These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19056744)

  • 1. Long-term results of high vs. normal impedance ventricular leads on actual (Real-Life) pacemaker generator longevity.
    Etsadashvili K; Hintringer F; Stühlinger M; Dichtl W; Spuller K; Antretter H; Hangler H; Pachinger O; Roithinger FX; Berger T
    Europace; 2009 Feb; 11(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 19056744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of high versus normal impedance ventricular leads on pacemaker generator longevity.
    Berger T; Roithinger FX; Antretter H; Hangler H; Pachinger O; Hintringer F
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Nov; 26(11):2116-20. PubMed ID: 14622313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of prophylactic epicardial pacing leads in children and young adults.
    Cohen MI; Rhodes LA; Spray TL; Gaynor JW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Jul; 78(1):197-202; discussion 202-3. PubMed ID: 15223427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Low stimulation impedance in pacemaker patients with cardiac diseases. The Thera Pacemaker Study Group].
    Schuchert A; van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Aug; 121(34-35):1046-9. PubMed ID: 8829905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical and technical determinants of long-term performance of coronary sinus leads.
    La Rocca V; Bertaglia E; Solimene F; Accogli M; Iuliano A; Marrazzo N; De Luca De Masi G; Scaccia A; Donnici G; Chiariello P; Turco P; De Simone A; Ciardiello C; Stabile G
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2010 Jan; 11(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 19770774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Leads and longevity: how long will your pacemaker last?
    Shepard RK; Ellenbogen KA
    Europace; 2009 Feb; 11(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 19109362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term performance of transvenous, steroid-eluting, high impedance, passive-fixation ventricular pacing leads.
    Yeh KH; Wang CC; Wen MS; Chou CC; Yeh SJ; Wu D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Oct; 27(10):1399-404. PubMed ID: 15511249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Permanent epicardial pacing in pediatric patients: 12-year experience at a single center.
    Kwak JG; Kim SJ; Song JY; Choi EY; Lee SY; Shim WS; Lee CH; Lee C; Park CS
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Feb; 93(2):634-9. PubMed ID: 22192754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term performance of active-fixation pacing leads: a prospective study.
    Kistler PM; Liew G; Mond HG
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Mar; 29(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 16606388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of ventricular Autocapture function in increasing longevity of DDDR pacemakers: a prospective study.
    Boriani G; Rusconi L; Biffi M; Pavia L; Sassara M; Malfitano D; Bongiorni MG; Padeletti L; Filice I; Sanfelici D; Maffei P; Vicentini A; Branzi A
    Europace; 2006 Mar; 8(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16627443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Device management of arrhythmias after Fontan conversion.
    Tsao S; Deal BJ; Backer CL; Ward K; Franklin WH; Mavroudis C
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Oct; 138(4):937-40. PubMed ID: 19660377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation: feasibility and intermediate term follow-up.
    Brandt J; Höijer CJ; Wierup P; Juul-Möller S; Boström PA
    Europace; 1999 Jul; 1(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 11225792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Worldwide evaluation of a defibrillation lead with a small geometric electrode surface for high-impedance pacing.
    Vollmann D; Ahern T; Gerritse B; Canby RC; Zenker D; Binner L; Kimber SK; Unterberg C;
    Am Heart J; 2003 Dec; 146(6):1066-70. PubMed ID: 14661000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term performance of coronary sinus leads used for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Iuliano A; Shopova G; De Simone A; Solimene F; Turco P; Marrazzo N; La Rocca V; Ciardiello C; Agrusta M; Stabile G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S47-9. PubMed ID: 17302716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of automatic threshold capture on pulse generator longevity.
    Chen RH; Chen KP; Wang FZ; Hua W; Zhang S
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Jun; 119(11):925-9. PubMed ID: 16780772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Active-fixation, steroid-eluting ventricular leads: the medium-term results in children.
    Ayabakan C; Celiker A; Karagöz T; Ozer S; Ozme S
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2005 Dec; 5(4):278-82. PubMed ID: 16330392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term safety and efficacy of right ventricular outflow tract pacing in patients with permanent pacemakers.
    Erdoğan O; Aktöz M; Altun A
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2008 Oct; 8(5):350-3. PubMed ID: 18849226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Twenty years of paediatric cardiac pacing: 515 pacemakers and 480 leads implanted in 292 patients.
    Silvetti MS; Drago F; Grutter G; De Santis A; Di Ciommo V; Ravà L
    Europace; 2006 Jul; 8(7):530-6. PubMed ID: 16798767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Permanent endovenous pediatric pacing: absence of lead failure--20 years follow-up study.
    Stojanov PL; Savic DV; Zivkovic MB; Calovic ZR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Sep; 31(9):1100-7. PubMed ID: 18834459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Acute pacing parameters of endocardial ventricular leads: comparison of two electrode designs].
    Machejek J; Lelakowski J; Bednarek J; Małecka B
    Kardiol Pol; 2004 Sep; 61 Suppl 2():II110-4. PubMed ID: 20527427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.